TY - JOUR T1 - Does a One Health approach to human African trypanosomiasis control hasten elimination? A stochastic compartmental modeling approach. AU - Meisner,Julianne, AU - Kato,Agapitus, AU - Lemerani,Marshall M, AU - Miaka,Erick M, AU - Ismail,Acaga T, AU - Wakefield,Jonathan, AU - Rowhani-Rahbar,Ali, AU - Pigott,David, AU - Mayer,Jonathan D, AU - Lorton,Christopher, AU - Rabinowitz,Peter M, Y1 - 2023/01/19/ PY - 2022/10/05/received PY - 2022/12/19/revised PY - 2022/12/21/accepted PY - 2024/04/01/pmc-release PY - 2023/1/23/pubmed PY - 2023/3/8/medline PY - 2023/1/22/entrez KW - HAT KW - Human African trypanosomiasis KW - One Health KW - Stochastic compartmental models KW - Zoonoses SP - 106804 EP - 106804 JF - Acta tropica JO - Acta Trop VL - 240 N2 - BACKGROUND: . In response to large strides in the control of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), in the early 2000s the WHO set targets for elimination of both the gambiense (gHAT) and rhodesiense (rHAT) forms as a public health (EPHP) problem by 2020, and elimination of gHAT transmisson (EOT) by 2030. While global EPHP targets have been met, and EOT appears within reach, current control strategies may fail to achieve gHAT EOT in the presence of animal reservoirs, the role of which is currently uncertain. Furthermore, rHAT is not targeted for EOT due to the known importance of animal reservoirs for this form. METHODS: . To evaluate the utility of a One Health approach to gHAT and rHAT EOT, we built and parameterized a compartmental stochastic model, using the Institute for Disease Modeling's Compartmental Modeling Software, to six HAT epidemics: the national rHAT epidemics in Uganda and Malawi, the national gHAT epidemics in Uganda and South Sudan, and two separate gHAT epidemics in Democratic Republic of Congo distinguished by dominant vector species. In rHAT foci the reservoir animal sub-model was stratified on four species groups, while in gHAT foci domestic swine were assumed to be the only competent reservoir. The modeled time horizon was 2005-2045, with calibration performed using HAT surveillance data and Optuna. Interventions included insecticide and trypanocide treatment of domestic animal reservoirs at varying coverage levels. RESULTS: . Validation against HAT surveillance data indicates favorable performance overall, with the possible exception of DRC. EOT was not observed in any modeled scenarios for rHAT, however insecticide treatment consistently performed better than trypanocide treatment in terms of rHAT control. EOT was not observed for gHAT at 0% coverage of domestic reservoirs with trypanocides or insecticides, but was observed by 2030 in all test scenarios; again, insecticides demonstrated superior performance to trypanocides. CONCLUSIONS: EOT likely cannot be achieved for rHAT without control of wildlife reservoirs, however insecticide treatment of domestic animals holds promise for improved control. In the presence of domestic animal reservoirs, gHAT EOT may not be achieved under current control strategies. SN - 1873-6254 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/36682395/Does_a_One_Health_approach_to_human_African_trypanosomiasis_control_hasten_elimination_A_stochastic_compartmental_modeling_approach_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -