Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Combined oral contraceptive pill compared with no medical treatment in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2023 Mar 20 [Online ahead of print]CE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As part of the update of the International Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a systematic review was performed to inform evidence-based recommendations.

DESIGN

Systematic review. Only randomised controlled trial were included.

PATIENTS

Women with PCOS; the use of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP) was compared with no medical treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes were designed in collaboration with clinical experts, researchers, and consumers. Critical outcomes included hirsutism, irregular cycles, quality of life, body mass index (BMI), and weight.

RESULTS

1660 publications were identified, but only four studies were included. No studies could be combined for meta-analysis. COCP treatment improved cycle regularity compared with no medical treatment (100% vs. 0%, with low certainty of evidence). COCP showed no difference in improvement of hirsutism or BMI compared with placebo or lifestyle; a lower weight after COCP compared with no treatment (mean difference [MD] -8.0 (95% confidence interval, CI -11.67); -4.33 kg); and improvement in quality of life (MD 1.2 [95% CI 0.96]; 1.44), but these results were all very low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Results show that COCP benefit cycle regulation, but other benefits or potential adverse effects were only identified with very low certainty of evidence. The COCP is frontline medical treatment in PCOS, but this is still based on established efficacy in the broader general population. Our results show that research in PCOS is seriously lacking and should be prioritised to capture core reproductive, metabolic and psychological outcomes important in PCOS.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia.Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine and Medical research Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Italy.Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia.Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.Discipline of Paedriatics, The University of Adelaide and Robinson Research Institute, North Adelaide, Australia.Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia.Monash Centre for Health Research & Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victori, Australia. Department of Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

36939017

Citation

Forslund, Maria, et al. "Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill Compared With No Medical Treatment in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review." Clinical Endocrinology, 2023.
Forslund M, Melin J, Alesi S, et al. Combined oral contraceptive pill compared with no medical treatment in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2023.
Forslund, M., Melin, J., Alesi, S., Piltonen, T., Romualdi, D., Tay, C. T., Witchel, S., Pena, A., Mousa, A., & Teede, H. (2023). Combined oral contraceptive pill compared with no medical treatment in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14913
Forslund M, et al. Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill Compared With No Medical Treatment in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2023 Mar 20; PubMed PMID: 36939017.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Combined oral contraceptive pill compared with no medical treatment in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review. AU - Forslund,Maria, AU - Melin,Johanna, AU - Alesi,Simon, AU - Piltonen,Terhi, AU - Romualdi,Daniela, AU - Tay,Chau Thien, AU - Witchel,Selma, AU - Pena,Alexia, AU - Mousa,Aya, AU - Teede,Helena, Y1 - 2023/03/20/ PY - 2023/03/02/revised PY - 2023/02/13/received PY - 2023/03/15/accepted PY - 2023/3/21/pubmed PY - 2023/3/21/medline PY - 2023/3/20/entrez KW - combined oral contraceptive pills KW - hyperandrogenism KW - irregular cycles KW - polycystic ovary syndrome KW - treatment JF - Clinical endocrinology JO - Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) N2 - OBJECTIVE: As part of the update of the International Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a systematic review was performed to inform evidence-based recommendations. DESIGN: Systematic review. Only randomised controlled trial were included. PATIENTS: Women with PCOS; the use of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCP) was compared with no medical treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were designed in collaboration with clinical experts, researchers, and consumers. Critical outcomes included hirsutism, irregular cycles, quality of life, body mass index (BMI), and weight. RESULTS: 1660 publications were identified, but only four studies were included. No studies could be combined for meta-analysis. COCP treatment improved cycle regularity compared with no medical treatment (100% vs. 0%, with low certainty of evidence). COCP showed no difference in improvement of hirsutism or BMI compared with placebo or lifestyle; a lower weight after COCP compared with no treatment (mean difference [MD] -8.0 (95% confidence interval, CI -11.67); -4.33 kg); and improvement in quality of life (MD 1.2 [95% CI 0.96]; 1.44), but these results were all very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: Results show that COCP benefit cycle regulation, but other benefits or potential adverse effects were only identified with very low certainty of evidence. The COCP is frontline medical treatment in PCOS, but this is still based on established efficacy in the broader general population. Our results show that research in PCOS is seriously lacking and should be prioritised to capture core reproductive, metabolic and psychological outcomes important in PCOS. SN - 1365-2265 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/36939017/Combined_oral_contraceptive_pill_compared_with_no_medical_treatment_in_the_management_of_polycystic_ovary_syndrome:_A_systematic_review_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.