Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications.
J Anesth. 2023 Mar 21 [Online ahead of print]JA

Abstract

PURPOSE

Generally, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor analgesia is performed in the lateral or sitting position; however, only few studies have investigated the effect of maternal position on labor analgesia induction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the influence of maternal position on induction time and complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed anesthetic and medical records regarding labor analgesia in 201 parturients treated between January 2019 and November 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their position (sitting or lateral) during induction. The primary outcome was the time required for CSEA induction. We compared 2 groups on the primary outcome and the occurrences of other complications during CSEA induction using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Moreover, we performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with induction time.

RESULTS

There was no significant between-group difference in the time required for induction. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed an independent association of the distance from the skin to the epidural space with the time required for induction. The lateral group had a significantly higher incidence of paresthesia than the sitting group (P = 0.028). The lateral group had a significantly higher ephedrine requirement (P < 0.001) than the sitting group.

CONCLUSION

Maternal position was not associated with the time required for CSEA induction. However, the sitting group had a lower paresthesia occurrence and ephedrine requirement than the lateral group. Other technical complications were not associated with maternal position during CSEA induction.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-Cho, Izumi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan. fmysawasaki@gmail.com. Department of Anesthesiology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-Cho, Kahoku-Gun, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan. fmysawasaki@gmail.com.Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-Cho, Izumi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan.Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-Cho, Izumi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

36943474

Citation

Sawasaki, Fumiya, et al. "Influence of Maternal Position During Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Labor Analgesia On Technical Difficulties and Complications." Journal of Anesthesia, 2023.
Sawasaki F, Takeshita J, Tachibana K. Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications. J Anesth. 2023.
Sawasaki, F., Takeshita, J., & Tachibana, K. (2023). Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications. Journal of Anesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03182-8
Sawasaki F, Takeshita J, Tachibana K. Influence of Maternal Position During Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Labor Analgesia On Technical Difficulties and Complications. J Anesth. 2023 Mar 21; PubMed PMID: 36943474.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of maternal position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia on technical difficulties and complications. AU - Sawasaki,Fumiya, AU - Takeshita,Jun, AU - Tachibana,Kazuya, Y1 - 2023/03/21/ PY - 2022/07/26/received PY - 2023/03/14/accepted PY - 2023/3/21/entrez PY - 2023/3/22/pubmed PY - 2023/3/22/medline KW - Analgesia KW - Anesthesia KW - CSEA KW - Epidural space KW - Labor KW - Maternal position JF - Journal of anesthesia JO - J Anesth N2 - PURPOSE: Generally, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for labor analgesia is performed in the lateral or sitting position; however, only few studies have investigated the effect of maternal position on labor analgesia induction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the influence of maternal position on induction time and complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed anesthetic and medical records regarding labor analgesia in 201 parturients treated between January 2019 and November 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on their position (sitting or lateral) during induction. The primary outcome was the time required for CSEA induction. We compared 2 groups on the primary outcome and the occurrences of other complications during CSEA induction using hyperbaric bupivacaine. Moreover, we performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with induction time. RESULTS: There was no significant between-group difference in the time required for induction. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed an independent association of the distance from the skin to the epidural space with the time required for induction. The lateral group had a significantly higher incidence of paresthesia than the sitting group (P = 0.028). The lateral group had a significantly higher ephedrine requirement (P < 0.001) than the sitting group. CONCLUSION: Maternal position was not associated with the time required for CSEA induction. However, the sitting group had a lower paresthesia occurrence and ephedrine requirement than the lateral group. Other technical complications were not associated with maternal position during CSEA induction. SN - 1438-8359 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/36943474/Influence_of_maternal_position_during_combined_spinal_epidural_anesthesia_for_labor_analgesia_on_technical_difficulties_and_complications_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.