The role of contact thermography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.Eur J Radiol. 1983 May; 3(2):99-102.EJ
Abstract
Contact thermography, a non-invasive inexpensive method of investigation for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb, was compared with conventional ascending phlebography in 69 patients. The results showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 97% and a diagnostic specificity of 50% giving an overall agreement of 73% between the methods. The low diagnostic specificity of thermography was to be expected, since any inflammatory reaction, whatever the cause, will give a rise in the skin-temperature. The high sensitivity shows that thermography is useful as a screening method. In the present material thermography could have prevented 25 per cent of the phlebographies.
MeSH
Pub Type(s)
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Language
eng
PubMed ID
6873085
Citation
Jensen, C, et al. "The Role of Contact Thermography in the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis." European Journal of Radiology, vol. 3, no. 2, 1983, pp. 99-102.
Jensen C, Knudsen LL, Hegedüs V. The role of contact thermography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Eur J Radiol. 1983;3(2):99-102.
Jensen, C., Knudsen, L. L., & Hegedüs, V. (1983). The role of contact thermography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. European Journal of Radiology, 3(2), 99-102.
Jensen C, Knudsen LL, Hegedüs V. The Role of Contact Thermography in the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis. Eur J Radiol. 1983;3(2):99-102. PubMed PMID: 6873085.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of contact thermography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.
AU - Jensen,C,
AU - Knudsen,L L,
AU - Hegedüs,V,
PY - 1983/5/1/pubmed
PY - 1983/5/1/medline
PY - 1983/5/1/entrez
SP - 99
EP - 102
JF - European journal of radiology
JO - Eur J Radiol
VL - 3
IS - 2
N2 - Contact thermography, a non-invasive inexpensive method of investigation for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb, was compared with conventional ascending phlebography in 69 patients. The results showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 97% and a diagnostic specificity of 50% giving an overall agreement of 73% between the methods. The low diagnostic specificity of thermography was to be expected, since any inflammatory reaction, whatever the cause, will give a rise in the skin-temperature. The high sensitivity shows that thermography is useful as a screening method. In the present material thermography could have prevented 25 per cent of the phlebographies.
SN - 0720-048X
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/6873085/The_role_of_contact_thermography_in_the_diagnosis_of_deep_venous_thrombosis_
L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/7087
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -