Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Labetalol vs. methyldopa in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 May; 49(2):125-30.IJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of labetalol compared with methyldopa in the management of mild and moderate cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).

METHODS

One hundred four primigravidas with PIH were randomly allocated to receive either labetalol (group A) or methyldopa (group B). The dose of the drugs was doubled every 48 h to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure < or = 103.6 mmHg. Clinico-biochemical effects and frequency of side effects were studied. The statistical level of significance was taken at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Ten patients in group B (18.5%) developed significant proteinuria (> 30 mg/dl) whereas none developed proteinuria in group A. Labetalol was quicker and more efficient at controlling blood pressure, having a beneficial effect on renal functions and causing fewer side effects compared with methyldopa. The rate of induction of labor and rate of cesarean section for uncontrolled PIH was less in group A (48% and 1%, respectively) compared with group B (63.0% and 5.6%, respectively). Moreover a higher Bishop score at induction of labor was noticed in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Labetalol is better tolerated than methyldopa, gives more efficient control of blood pressure and may have a ripening effect on the uterine cervix.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Jahra Hospital, Jahra, Kuwait.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

7649315

Citation

el-Qarmalawi, A M., et al. "Labetalol Vs. Methyldopa in the Treatment of Pregnancy-induced Hypertension." International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 49, no. 2, 1995, pp. 125-30.
el-Qarmalawi AM, Morsy AH, al-Fadly A, et al. Labetalol vs. methyldopa in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;49(2):125-30.
el-Qarmalawi, A. M., Morsy, A. H., al-Fadly, A., Obeid, A., & Hashem, M. (1995). Labetalol vs. methyldopa in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 49(2), 125-30.
el-Qarmalawi AM, et al. Labetalol Vs. Methyldopa in the Treatment of Pregnancy-induced Hypertension. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;49(2):125-30. PubMed PMID: 7649315.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Labetalol vs. methyldopa in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension. AU - el-Qarmalawi,A M, AU - Morsy,A H, AU - al-Fadly,A, AU - Obeid,A, AU - Hashem,M, PY - 1995/5/1/pubmed PY - 1995/5/1/medline PY - 1995/5/1/entrez SP - 125 EP - 30 JF - International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics JO - Int J Gynaecol Obstet VL - 49 IS - 2 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of labetalol compared with methyldopa in the management of mild and moderate cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). METHODS: One hundred four primigravidas with PIH were randomly allocated to receive either labetalol (group A) or methyldopa (group B). The dose of the drugs was doubled every 48 h to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure < or = 103.6 mmHg. Clinico-biochemical effects and frequency of side effects were studied. The statistical level of significance was taken at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Ten patients in group B (18.5%) developed significant proteinuria (> 30 mg/dl) whereas none developed proteinuria in group A. Labetalol was quicker and more efficient at controlling blood pressure, having a beneficial effect on renal functions and causing fewer side effects compared with methyldopa. The rate of induction of labor and rate of cesarean section for uncontrolled PIH was less in group A (48% and 1%, respectively) compared with group B (63.0% and 5.6%, respectively). Moreover a higher Bishop score at induction of labor was noticed in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Labetalol is better tolerated than methyldopa, gives more efficient control of blood pressure and may have a ripening effect on the uterine cervix. SN - 0020-7292 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/7649315/Labetalol_vs__methyldopa_in_the_treatment_of_pregnancy_induced_hypertension_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002072929502351C DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -