Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems.
Am J Dent. 1993 Dec; 6(6):291-4.AJ

Abstract

This study compared the shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to porcelain with six commercial porcelain repair adhesive systems. The porcelain repair systems tested were: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Porcelain Bond, Ceram-Etch, C&B Metabond with Etch-Free Primer, Scotchprime, and Ultradent Porcelain Etch. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to primed porcelain surfaces and the specimens were thermocycled and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 36 days. After storage, a testing machine was used to deliver a shear force parallel to the porcelain/composite interface. Mean load to failure was calculated for each group and the fracture location was noted. Results demonstrated cohesive porcelain failures and high bond strengths for All-Bond 2, Clearfil, Metabond, Scotchprime, and Ultradent. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower bond strengths for the group that failed at the porcelain/composite interface.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Family Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

7880478

Citation

Diaz-Arnold, A M., et al. "Bond Strengths of Porcelain Repair Adhesive Systems." American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 6, 1993, pp. 291-4.
Diaz-Arnold AM, Wistrom DW, Aquilino SA, et al. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1993;6(6):291-4.
Diaz-Arnold, A. M., Wistrom, D. W., Aquilino, S. A., & Swift, E. J. (1993). Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. American Journal of Dentistry, 6(6), 291-4.
Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Bond Strengths of Porcelain Repair Adhesive Systems. Am J Dent. 1993;6(6):291-4. PubMed PMID: 7880478.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. AU - Diaz-Arnold,A M, AU - Wistrom,D W, AU - Aquilino,S A, AU - Swift,E J,Jr PY - 1993/12/1/pubmed PY - 2001/3/28/medline PY - 1993/12/1/entrez SP - 291 EP - 4 JF - American journal of dentistry JO - Am J Dent VL - 6 IS - 6 N2 - This study compared the shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to porcelain with six commercial porcelain repair adhesive systems. The porcelain repair systems tested were: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Porcelain Bond, Ceram-Etch, C&B Metabond with Etch-Free Primer, Scotchprime, and Ultradent Porcelain Etch. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to primed porcelain surfaces and the specimens were thermocycled and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 36 days. After storage, a testing machine was used to deliver a shear force parallel to the porcelain/composite interface. Mean load to failure was calculated for each group and the fracture location was noted. Results demonstrated cohesive porcelain failures and high bond strengths for All-Bond 2, Clearfil, Metabond, Scotchprime, and Ultradent. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower bond strengths for the group that failed at the porcelain/composite interface. SN - 0894-8275 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/7880478/Bond_strengths_of_porcelain_repair_adhesive_systems_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -