Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Resistive pressure of a condenser humidifier in mechanically ventilated patients.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov; 22(11):1792-5.CC

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Heat and moisture exchangers (or "nose" humidifiers) are commonly used to aid in the humidification of inspired gases of mechanically ventilated patients. These devices add resistance to the ventilator circuit that has heretofore not been quantified in critically ill patients. Accordingly, we determined the resistive pressures associated with new and old (but < 24 hrs in the circuit) humidifiers in 23 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Adult medical and surgical intensive care units at a university center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients using a condenser humidifier between the wye and the endotracheal tube.

INTERVENTIONS

Peak and plateau airway pressures were determined with the humidifier in place. These measurements were repeated without the humidifier, then after insertion of a fresh humidifier into the circuit. In five patients, measurements were repeated after humidifiers had remained in place for a full 24 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The new humidifiers increased the resistive pressure of the ventilator circuit by 4.8 +/- 2.6 cm H2O compared with no humidifier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 4.2 +/- 1.5 cm H2O/L/sec. Old humidifiers increased resistive pressure by 6.3 +/- 3.6 cm H2O compared with no humidifier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 5.1 +/- 1.8 cm H2O/L/sec. The resistive pressure doubled from 3.4 +/- 1.2 to 7.0 +/- 1.8 cm H2O (p < .01) in five patients in whom the humidifiers were left in the ventilator circuit for a full 24 hrs.

CONCLUSIONS

The humidifier adds a significant resistance to the ventilator circuit which may lead to incorrect assessment of respiratory system mechanics, to inappropriate therapy (e.g., bronchodilators), or to difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

7956283

Citation

Manthous, C A., and G A. Schmidt. "Resistive Pressure of a Condenser Humidifier in Mechanically Ventilated Patients." Critical Care Medicine, vol. 22, no. 11, 1994, pp. 1792-5.
Manthous CA, Schmidt GA. Resistive pressure of a condenser humidifier in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(11):1792-5.
Manthous, C. A., & Schmidt, G. A. (1994). Resistive pressure of a condenser humidifier in mechanically ventilated patients. Critical Care Medicine, 22(11), 1792-5.
Manthous CA, Schmidt GA. Resistive Pressure of a Condenser Humidifier in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(11):1792-5. PubMed PMID: 7956283.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Resistive pressure of a condenser humidifier in mechanically ventilated patients. AU - Manthous,C A, AU - Schmidt,G A, PY - 1994/11/1/pubmed PY - 1994/11/1/medline PY - 1994/11/1/entrez SP - 1792 EP - 5 JF - Critical care medicine JO - Crit Care Med VL - 22 IS - 11 N2 - OBJECTIVES: Heat and moisture exchangers (or "nose" humidifiers) are commonly used to aid in the humidification of inspired gases of mechanically ventilated patients. These devices add resistance to the ventilator circuit that has heretofore not been quantified in critically ill patients. Accordingly, we determined the resistive pressures associated with new and old (but < 24 hrs in the circuit) humidifiers in 23 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Adult medical and surgical intensive care units at a university center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients using a condenser humidifier between the wye and the endotracheal tube. INTERVENTIONS: Peak and plateau airway pressures were determined with the humidifier in place. These measurements were repeated without the humidifier, then after insertion of a fresh humidifier into the circuit. In five patients, measurements were repeated after humidifiers had remained in place for a full 24 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The new humidifiers increased the resistive pressure of the ventilator circuit by 4.8 +/- 2.6 cm H2O compared with no humidifier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 4.2 +/- 1.5 cm H2O/L/sec. Old humidifiers increased resistive pressure by 6.3 +/- 3.6 cm H2O compared with no humidifier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 5.1 +/- 1.8 cm H2O/L/sec. The resistive pressure doubled from 3.4 +/- 1.2 to 7.0 +/- 1.8 cm H2O (p < .01) in five patients in whom the humidifiers were left in the ventilator circuit for a full 24 hrs. CONCLUSIONS: The humidifier adds a significant resistance to the ventilator circuit which may lead to incorrect assessment of respiratory system mechanics, to inappropriate therapy (e.g., bronchodilators), or to difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation. SN - 0090-3493 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/7956283/Resistive_pressure_of_a_condenser_humidifier_in_mechanically_ventilated_patients_ L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;PAGE=linkout&amp;SEARCH=7956283.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -