Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models.
Med Care. 1994 Jul; 32(7 Suppl):JS52-64.MC

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include choice of model type, perspective of the analysis, choice of utility scheme and identification of strategies that should be included and events that should be modeled. In addition, a set of rules for correct decision model structure may help to identify common errors. Although not necessarily exhaustive, this scheme provides an approach by which a reviewer may judge the adequacy of a decision model presented for publication or as the basis for a health policy.

Authors+Show Affiliations

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08903.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

8028413

Citation

Sonnenberg, F A., et al. "Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models." Medical Care, vol. 32, no. 7 Suppl, 1994, pp. JS52-64.
Sonnenberg FA, Roberts MS, Tsevat J, et al. Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. Med Care. 1994;32(7 Suppl):JS52-64.
Sonnenberg, F. A., Roberts, M. S., Tsevat, J., Wong, J. B., Barry, M., & Kent, D. L. (1994). Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. Medical Care, 32(7 Suppl), JS52-64.
Sonnenberg FA, et al. Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models. Med Care. 1994;32(7 Suppl):JS52-64. PubMed PMID: 8028413.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Toward a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. AU - Sonnenberg,F A, AU - Roberts,M S, AU - Tsevat,J, AU - Wong,J B, AU - Barry,M, AU - Kent,D L, PY - 1994/7/1/pubmed PY - 1994/7/1/medline PY - 1994/7/1/entrez SP - JS52 EP - 64 JF - Medical care JO - Med Care VL - 32 IS - 7 Suppl N2 - This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include choice of model type, perspective of the analysis, choice of utility scheme and identification of strategies that should be included and events that should be modeled. In addition, a set of rules for correct decision model structure may help to identify common errors. Although not necessarily exhaustive, this scheme provides an approach by which a reviewer may judge the adequacy of a decision model presented for publication or as the basis for a health policy. SN - 0025-7079 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/8028413/Toward_a_peer_review_process_for_medical_decision_analysis_models_ L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=linkout&SEARCH=8028413.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -