Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Hysteroscopy versus hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of sterility and infertility].
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1994; 116(1):24-7.ZG

Abstract

In a prospective study of 68 infertile patients the findings of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy have been compared. Hysterosalpingography showed in 3 cases false-negative results and in 10 cases false-positive results. Hysterosalpingography is especially limited for diagnostics of intrauterine adhesions. Hysteroscopy should be a necessary component of diagnostics of sterility, also in case of normal hysterosalpingographical findings.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Medizinischen Fakultät, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

ger

PubMed ID

8147176

Citation

Römer, T, et al. "[Hysteroscopy Versus Hysterosalpingography in Diagnosis of Sterility and Infertility]." Zentralblatt Fur Gynakologie, vol. 116, no. 1, 1994, pp. 24-7.
Römer T, Bojahr B, Lober R. [Hysteroscopy versus hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of sterility and infertility]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1994;116(1):24-7.
Römer, T., Bojahr, B., & Lober, R. (1994). [Hysteroscopy versus hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of sterility and infertility]. Zentralblatt Fur Gynakologie, 116(1), 24-7.
Römer T, Bojahr B, Lober R. [Hysteroscopy Versus Hysterosalpingography in Diagnosis of Sterility and Infertility]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1994;116(1):24-7. PubMed PMID: 8147176.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Hysteroscopy versus hysterosalpingography in diagnosis of sterility and infertility]. AU - Römer,T, AU - Bojahr,B, AU - Lober,R, PY - 1994/1/1/pubmed PY - 1994/1/1/medline PY - 1994/1/1/entrez SP - 24 EP - 7 JF - Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie JO - Zentralbl Gynakol VL - 116 IS - 1 N2 - In a prospective study of 68 infertile patients the findings of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy have been compared. Hysterosalpingography showed in 3 cases false-negative results and in 10 cases false-positive results. Hysterosalpingography is especially limited for diagnostics of intrauterine adhesions. Hysteroscopy should be a necessary component of diagnostics of sterility, also in case of normal hysterosalpingographical findings. SN - 0044-4197 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/8147176/[Hysteroscopy_versus_hysterosalpingography_in_diagnosis_of_sterility_and_infertility]_ L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/9713 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -