Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83.IJ

Abstract

This study compared the caries inhibition and microleakage of two liners under amalgam restorations. Thirty-two molars received mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal Class II cavity preparations. Calcium hydroxide was randomly placed as a liner in one preparation of each tooth and glass-ionomer cement liner was placed in the other. Amalgam restorations were placed. Teeth were axially loaded and an acid-protective varnish was placed. Teeth were placed into artificial saliva for 3 months, thermocycled, and cycled through a caries challenge. Sections were obtained from 20 teeth and photographed under polarized light. The remaining teeth were placed in 2% basic fuchsin and sectioned. A t-test indicated that restorations with glass-ionomer cement liners exhibited significantly less demineralization and microleakage than did restorations with calcium hydroxide liners.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Oral Oncology, M.D. Anderson Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

8300324

Citation

Rabchinsky, J, and K J. Donly. "A Comparison of Glass-ionomer Cement and Calcium Hydroxide Liners in Amalgam Restorations." The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 4, 1993, pp. 378-83.
Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13(4):378-83.
Rabchinsky, J., & Donly, K. J. (1993). A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 13(4), 378-83.
Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ. A Comparison of Glass-ionomer Cement and Calcium Hydroxide Liners in Amalgam Restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13(4):378-83. PubMed PMID: 8300324.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. AU - Rabchinsky,J, AU - Donly,K J, PY - 1993/8/1/pubmed PY - 1993/8/1/medline PY - 1993/8/1/entrez SP - 378 EP - 83 JF - The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry JO - Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent VL - 13 IS - 4 N2 - This study compared the caries inhibition and microleakage of two liners under amalgam restorations. Thirty-two molars received mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal Class II cavity preparations. Calcium hydroxide was randomly placed as a liner in one preparation of each tooth and glass-ionomer cement liner was placed in the other. Amalgam restorations were placed. Teeth were axially loaded and an acid-protective varnish was placed. Teeth were placed into artificial saliva for 3 months, thermocycled, and cycled through a caries challenge. Sections were obtained from 20 teeth and photographed under polarized light. The remaining teeth were placed in 2% basic fuchsin and sectioned. A t-test indicated that restorations with glass-ionomer cement liners exhibited significantly less demineralization and microleakage than did restorations with calcium hydroxide liners. SN - 0198-7569 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/8300324/A_comparison_of_glass_ionomer_cement_and_calcium_hydroxide_liners_in_amalgam_restorations_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -