Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of direct monocular endoscopic, two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task performance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997 Feb; 22(1):65-7.CO

Abstract

Surgeons performing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) traditionally rely on direct endoscopic viewing through a single monocular Hopkins rod lens telescope. While the majority of surgeons have found this satisfactory, most other endoscopic surgical specialties have moved to 2-D video endoscopy, where a monoscopic image is presented on a television monitor. This study set out to determine whether 2-D or 3-D display systems had any advantage over direct endoscopy in FESS. Ten otolaryngology trainees performed a series of standardized procedures on a FESS model using direct endoscopic vision, 2-D and 3-D. A performance score was obtained by dividing the execution time by the number of tasks achieved. There was a significant difference in both surgical and diagnostic task performance with 2-D (mean scores 56.8 and 41.1) performing better than direct endoscopy (mean scores 94.1 and 74.1) (P < 0.05). Tasks were also performed significantly better with 3-D compared with 2-D (P < 0.05).

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

9088684

Citation

White, P S., et al. "Comparison of Direct Monocular Endoscopic, Two- and Three-dimensional Display Systems On Surgical Task Performance in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery." Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, 1997, pp. 65-7.
White PS, Frizelle FA, Hanna GB, et al. Comparison of direct monocular endoscopic, two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task performance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997;22(1):65-7.
White, P. S., Frizelle, F. A., Hanna, G. B., Tan, L. K., Gardiner, Q., & Cuschieri, A. (1997). Comparison of direct monocular endoscopic, two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task performance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 22(1), 65-7.
White PS, et al. Comparison of Direct Monocular Endoscopic, Two- and Three-dimensional Display Systems On Surgical Task Performance in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997;22(1):65-7. PubMed PMID: 9088684.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of direct monocular endoscopic, two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task performance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. AU - White,P S, AU - Frizelle,F A, AU - Hanna,G B, AU - Tan,L K, AU - Gardiner,Q, AU - Cuschieri,A, PY - 1997/2/1/pubmed PY - 1997/2/1/medline PY - 1997/2/1/entrez SP - 65 EP - 7 JF - Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences JO - Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci VL - 22 IS - 1 N2 - Surgeons performing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) traditionally rely on direct endoscopic viewing through a single monocular Hopkins rod lens telescope. While the majority of surgeons have found this satisfactory, most other endoscopic surgical specialties have moved to 2-D video endoscopy, where a monoscopic image is presented on a television monitor. This study set out to determine whether 2-D or 3-D display systems had any advantage over direct endoscopy in FESS. Ten otolaryngology trainees performed a series of standardized procedures on a FESS model using direct endoscopic vision, 2-D and 3-D. A performance score was obtained by dividing the execution time by the number of tasks achieved. There was a significant difference in both surgical and diagnostic task performance with 2-D (mean scores 56.8 and 41.1) performing better than direct endoscopy (mean scores 94.1 and 74.1) (P < 0.05). Tasks were also performed significantly better with 3-D compared with 2-D (P < 0.05). SN - 0307-7772 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/9088684/Comparison_of_direct_monocular_endoscopic_two__and_three_dimensional_display_systems_on_surgical_task_performance_in_functional_endoscopic_sinus_surgery_ L2 - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&amp;sid=nlm:pubmed&amp;issn=0307-7772&amp;date=1997&amp;volume=22&amp;issue=1&amp;spage=65 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -