Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The design of arm pressure covers to alleviate pain in high G maneuvers.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 May; 69(5):461-7.AS

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Arm pain has been noted especially when increased coverage anti-G suits are worn in combination with PBG (pressure breathing during G) in high G centrifuge test runs. Arm pain has forced the termination of test runs and has the potential to cause a serious decrement in a pilot's ability to function effectively during high-G flight. Based on the theory that arm pain is caused by fluid pooling in the arm, four new pressure cover systems for the arm were designed and tested.

METHODS

Seven test subjects wore each design in a series of runs in a dynamic flight simulator (DFS). Subjects experienced both gradual and rapid onset rate runs with G levels ranging from +3.0 G to +9.0 G. Data were collected on the maximum G's achieved, pain location, and pain intensity. Subjective responses on the comfort and function of each design and overall arm cover design preferences were also obtained via a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Analysis of the DFS data, using a two-factor ANOVA (subjects, designs), revealed that each of the new designs provided significantly better protection from arm pain than the control condition (no protection) and that each of the designs significantly improved the maximum G level attained during rapid onset acceleration in the range of +1 G.

CONCLUSION

No positive correlation was found between subject ranking of the four new design concepts at the conclusion of the study in terms of the pain reduction they provided and the pain levels reported during DFS testing.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850-4401, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

9591615

Citation

Watkins, S M., et al. "The Design of Arm Pressure Covers to Alleviate Pain in High G Maneuvers." Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 69, no. 5, 1998, pp. 461-7.
Watkins SM, Welch L, Whitley P, et al. The design of arm pressure covers to alleviate pain in high G maneuvers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998;69(5):461-7.
Watkins, S. M., Welch, L., Whitley, P., & Forster, E. (1998). The design of arm pressure covers to alleviate pain in high G maneuvers. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 69(5), 461-7.
Watkins SM, et al. The Design of Arm Pressure Covers to Alleviate Pain in High G Maneuvers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998;69(5):461-7. PubMed PMID: 9591615.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The design of arm pressure covers to alleviate pain in high G maneuvers. AU - Watkins,S M, AU - Welch,L, AU - Whitley,P, AU - Forster,E, PY - 1998/5/20/pubmed PY - 1998/5/20/medline PY - 1998/5/20/entrez SP - 461 EP - 7 JF - Aviation, space, and environmental medicine JO - Aviat Space Environ Med VL - 69 IS - 5 N2 - HYPOTHESIS: Arm pain has been noted especially when increased coverage anti-G suits are worn in combination with PBG (pressure breathing during G) in high G centrifuge test runs. Arm pain has forced the termination of test runs and has the potential to cause a serious decrement in a pilot's ability to function effectively during high-G flight. Based on the theory that arm pain is caused by fluid pooling in the arm, four new pressure cover systems for the arm were designed and tested. METHODS: Seven test subjects wore each design in a series of runs in a dynamic flight simulator (DFS). Subjects experienced both gradual and rapid onset rate runs with G levels ranging from +3.0 G to +9.0 G. Data were collected on the maximum G's achieved, pain location, and pain intensity. Subjective responses on the comfort and function of each design and overall arm cover design preferences were also obtained via a questionnaire. RESULTS: Analysis of the DFS data, using a two-factor ANOVA (subjects, designs), revealed that each of the new designs provided significantly better protection from arm pain than the control condition (no protection) and that each of the designs significantly improved the maximum G level attained during rapid onset acceleration in the range of +1 G. CONCLUSION: No positive correlation was found between subject ranking of the four new design concepts at the conclusion of the study in terms of the pain reduction they provided and the pain levels reported during DFS testing. SN - 0095-6562 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/9591615/The_design_of_arm_pressure_covers_to_alleviate_pain_in_high_G_maneuvers_ L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/pain.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -