Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal labor analgesia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul; 179(1):150-5.AJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the relationship between maternal position and the incidence of prolonged decelerations after epidural bupivacaine or intrathecal sufentanil analgesia for labor.

STUDY DESIGN

Laboring, healthy, term parturient women, with reassuring fetal heart rate tracings, requesting either epidural (n = 145) or intrathecal (n = 160) analgesia were randomly assigned to lie either supine with measured 30-degree left uterine displacement (n = 136) or in the left lateral decubitus position (n = 145). Patients received either intrathecal sufentanil, 10 microg, or epidural 0.25% bupivacaine, 13 mL. An obstetrician, unaware of patient position or type of anesthesia, examined the fetal heart rate tracings.

RESULTS

No demographic differences were noted among the groups. Prolonged decelerations occurred with equal frequency after epidural bupivacaine and intrathecal sufentanil (3.9%). Prolonged decelerations were not related to maternal position. No emergency cesarean deliveries were performed as a result of prolonged decelerations. Prolonged decelerations correlated with the frequency of contractions before induction of analgesia (P < .05). Fewer fetal heart rate accelerations were noted after intrathecal sufentanil than after epidural bupivacaine (P < .005). More ephedrine was used after epidural bupivacaine (P < .001). Patients who received epidural analgesia in the left lateral position were more likely to have an asymmetric block (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of prolonged deceleration after epidural bupivacaine or intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia is unrelated to maternal position or analgesic technique.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, New York 12208-3479, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

9704781

Citation

Eberle, R L., et al. "The Effect of Maternal Position On Fetal Heart Rate During Epidural or Intrathecal Labor Analgesia." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 179, no. 1, 1998, pp. 150-5.
Eberle RL, Norris MC, Eberle AM, et al. The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal labor analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):150-5.
Eberle, R. L., Norris, M. C., Eberle, A. M., Naulty, J. S., & Arkoosh, V. A. (1998). The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal labor analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 179(1), 150-5.
Eberle RL, et al. The Effect of Maternal Position On Fetal Heart Rate During Epidural or Intrathecal Labor Analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):150-5. PubMed PMID: 9704781.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal labor analgesia. AU - Eberle,R L, AU - Norris,M C, AU - Eberle,A M, AU - Naulty,J S, AU - Arkoosh,V A, PY - 1998/8/15/pubmed PY - 1998/8/15/medline PY - 1998/8/15/entrez SP - 150 EP - 5 JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology JO - Am J Obstet Gynecol VL - 179 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the relationship between maternal position and the incidence of prolonged decelerations after epidural bupivacaine or intrathecal sufentanil analgesia for labor. STUDY DESIGN: Laboring, healthy, term parturient women, with reassuring fetal heart rate tracings, requesting either epidural (n = 145) or intrathecal (n = 160) analgesia were randomly assigned to lie either supine with measured 30-degree left uterine displacement (n = 136) or in the left lateral decubitus position (n = 145). Patients received either intrathecal sufentanil, 10 microg, or epidural 0.25% bupivacaine, 13 mL. An obstetrician, unaware of patient position or type of anesthesia, examined the fetal heart rate tracings. RESULTS: No demographic differences were noted among the groups. Prolonged decelerations occurred with equal frequency after epidural bupivacaine and intrathecal sufentanil (3.9%). Prolonged decelerations were not related to maternal position. No emergency cesarean deliveries were performed as a result of prolonged decelerations. Prolonged decelerations correlated with the frequency of contractions before induction of analgesia (P < .05). Fewer fetal heart rate accelerations were noted after intrathecal sufentanil than after epidural bupivacaine (P < .005). More ephedrine was used after epidural bupivacaine (P < .001). Patients who received epidural analgesia in the left lateral position were more likely to have an asymmetric block (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of prolonged deceleration after epidural bupivacaine or intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia is unrelated to maternal position or analgesic technique. SN - 0002-9378 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/9704781/The_effect_of_maternal_position_on_fetal_heart_rate_during_epidural_or_intrathecal_labor_analgesia_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937898702662 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -