Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care.
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct; 102(4):E44.Ped

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared utilization of health care services by children with chronic conditions who were insured by either Medicaid or an employer group in 1992 and 1993. Five chronic conditions were selected to illustrate patterns of service use: asthma, attention deficit disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, and sickle cell anemia.

METHODOLOGY

Administrative databases were used to develop estimates of health services utilization for children <18 years of age with the five selected conditions, who had been enrolled for at least 6 continuous months. All claims for a child identified with one of these five conditions were included in the analysis, including claims for diagnoses and procedures not directly related to the primary diagnosis. Estimates were derived for eight services (eg, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED), home health). Data were used from two Independent Practice Association model health plans in two states. Differences across the states were controlled by selecting one Medicaid and one employer-insured program from each of the two plans in both states. Regional variation was controlled for because both health plans were located in one geographical region. In each case, physicians were paid on a fee-for-service basis, with generally open access to specialists rather than primary care gatekeeper models of delivery: t tests were used to compare service use rates between Medicaid and employer-insured populations.

RESULTS

A total of 8668 children across all health plan groups had at least one of the selected conditions. Because Medicaid enrolled-children tended to be younger, analyses were adjusted for age. In both systems, a greater percentage of Medicaid children had these five study conditions (5%) compared with employer-insured children (3%), suggesting that the Medicaid population was sicker. Mean length of enrollment during the 2-year study was longer for children in employer-insured programs. Children with chronic conditions enrolled in Medicaid managed care generally used services at a higher rate compared with children with similar conditions enrolled in employer-insured managed care. The extent of the increased use varied by condition, by service type, and by plan. Children with any of the chronic conditions studied had from 2 to almost 5 times more ED visits if they were enrolled in Medicaid than if they were enrolled in employer-based managed care, depending on the specific condition. In one of the two plans, Medicaid-enrolled children had more outpatient services, laboratory services, and radiography services than their counterparts in employer-based managed care. The same pattern of use was found for home health services (except for children with diabetes) and for office visits (except for children with sickle cell). The results show higher use of all services by children with asthma and diabetes in Medicaid managed care compared with employer-based managed care. In contrast, the pattern is mixed for children with epilepsy and sickle cell. The sample size of children with these conditions was smaller than with the three other conditions, which may account, in part, for a varied pattern of results. The pattern of use for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was generally different from the other conditions. Children with ADHD in employer-based managed care had more hospital admissions, hospital days, and office visits than their counterparts in Medicaid managed care. In contrast, Medicaid-enrolled children with ADHD had more ED visits, laboratory services, outpatient hospital visits, and radiography services. Other than ED visits, the differences in service use between Medicaid and employer-insured children with ADHD were minimal. Of note, the pattern for ADHD is the same for most services for Plans A and B (excluding home health visits). This utilization pattern may reflect service use for comorbid conditions. Part of this difference may be explained by differences in Medicaid e

Authors+Show Affiliations

Center for Health Care Policy and Evaluation, United HealthCare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

9755281

Citation

Shatin, D, et al. "Health Care Utilization By Children With Chronic Illnesses: a Comparison of Medicaid and Employer-insured Managed Care." Pediatrics, vol. 102, no. 4, 1998, pp. E44.
Shatin D, Levin R, Ireys HT, et al. Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):E44.
Shatin, D., Levin, R., Ireys, H. T., & Haller, V. (1998). Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care. Pediatrics, 102(4), E44.
Shatin D, et al. Health Care Utilization By Children With Chronic Illnesses: a Comparison of Medicaid and Employer-insured Managed Care. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):E44. PubMed PMID: 9755281.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care. AU - Shatin,D, AU - Levin,R, AU - Ireys,H T, AU - Haller,V, PY - 1998/10/2/pubmed PY - 1998/10/2/medline PY - 1998/10/2/entrez SP - E44 EP - E44 JF - Pediatrics JO - Pediatrics VL - 102 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study compared utilization of health care services by children with chronic conditions who were insured by either Medicaid or an employer group in 1992 and 1993. Five chronic conditions were selected to illustrate patterns of service use: asthma, attention deficit disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, and sickle cell anemia. METHODOLOGY: Administrative databases were used to develop estimates of health services utilization for children <18 years of age with the five selected conditions, who had been enrolled for at least 6 continuous months. All claims for a child identified with one of these five conditions were included in the analysis, including claims for diagnoses and procedures not directly related to the primary diagnosis. Estimates were derived for eight services (eg, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED), home health). Data were used from two Independent Practice Association model health plans in two states. Differences across the states were controlled by selecting one Medicaid and one employer-insured program from each of the two plans in both states. Regional variation was controlled for because both health plans were located in one geographical region. In each case, physicians were paid on a fee-for-service basis, with generally open access to specialists rather than primary care gatekeeper models of delivery: t tests were used to compare service use rates between Medicaid and employer-insured populations. RESULTS: A total of 8668 children across all health plan groups had at least one of the selected conditions. Because Medicaid enrolled-children tended to be younger, analyses were adjusted for age. In both systems, a greater percentage of Medicaid children had these five study conditions (5%) compared with employer-insured children (3%), suggesting that the Medicaid population was sicker. Mean length of enrollment during the 2-year study was longer for children in employer-insured programs. Children with chronic conditions enrolled in Medicaid managed care generally used services at a higher rate compared with children with similar conditions enrolled in employer-insured managed care. The extent of the increased use varied by condition, by service type, and by plan. Children with any of the chronic conditions studied had from 2 to almost 5 times more ED visits if they were enrolled in Medicaid than if they were enrolled in employer-based managed care, depending on the specific condition. In one of the two plans, Medicaid-enrolled children had more outpatient services, laboratory services, and radiography services than their counterparts in employer-based managed care. The same pattern of use was found for home health services (except for children with diabetes) and for office visits (except for children with sickle cell). The results show higher use of all services by children with asthma and diabetes in Medicaid managed care compared with employer-based managed care. In contrast, the pattern is mixed for children with epilepsy and sickle cell. The sample size of children with these conditions was smaller than with the three other conditions, which may account, in part, for a varied pattern of results. The pattern of use for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was generally different from the other conditions. Children with ADHD in employer-based managed care had more hospital admissions, hospital days, and office visits than their counterparts in Medicaid managed care. In contrast, Medicaid-enrolled children with ADHD had more ED visits, laboratory services, outpatient hospital visits, and radiography services. Other than ED visits, the differences in service use between Medicaid and employer-insured children with ADHD were minimal. Of note, the pattern for ADHD is the same for most services for Plans A and B (excluding home health visits). This utilization pattern may reflect service use for comorbid conditions. Part of this difference may be explained by differences in Medicaid e SN - 1098-4275 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/9755281/Health_care_utilization_by_children_with_chronic_illnesses:_a_comparison_of_medicaid_and_employer_insured_managed_care_ L2 - http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&amp;pmid=9755281 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -