Epidemiological and imaging findings indicate that gout frequently affects damaged joints. Recent studies suggest that the relationship between gout and joint damage may be more complex than a simple unidirectional link and that joint damage may promote the development of gout at affected sites. In this article, we review the clinical associations and recent laboratory research identifying events in the setting of osteoarthritis or joint injury that can alter the intraarticular microenvironment and locally regulate monosodium urate crystallisation and deposition or amplify the inflammatory response to deposited crystals. This includes cartilage matrix proteins or fibres released into the articular space that accelerates the crystallisation process, as well as the lack of lubricin and fibroblast priming that enhances the immune response towards the deposited crystals. These findings provide new insights into gout pathogenesis and offer a possible explanation for the site preference of gout in the damaged joint.

The rheumatic diseases are a diverse group of conditions that can display autoantibody production, functional immune disturbances and systemic disease manifestations. These autoantibodies can serve as markers for classification, diagnosis, prognosis and disease activity. Among specificities prominently expressed by patients, those directed to nuclear antigens (antinuclear antibodies or ANAs) are markers for specific rheumatic diseases. ANAs can bind to DNA, RNA and complexes of proteins with nucleic acids. Other autoantibodies expressed in the rheumatic diseases are directed to proteins, including IgG, post-translational modifications of proteins and soluble mediators such as cytokines. While autoantibodies have been investigated for over 50 years, recent studies published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) have provided an exciting perspective on the mechanisms of autoantibody production and the power of new technologies to identify novel autoantibody targets to elucidate aetiology and underpin patient evaluation. Furthermore, in-depth serological studies have demonstrated a phenomenon known as clustering; clustering defines sets of autoantibodies that are commonly expressed together in patients with a given rheumatic disease. Other research reported in ARD has used B cell phenotyping and genotypic analysis to subtype patients, and has explored the relationship of autoantibodies, complement activation and patterns of gene expression as exemplified by the interferon gene signature. Together, these studies provide important new insights into disease mechanisms as well as actionable information to facilitate personalised patient care.