Significance of isolated positive IgM serologic results by enzyme immunoassay for coccidioidomycosis.
Mycopathologia. 2008 Aug; 166(2):77-82.M

Abstract

Serologic testing is important for diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis. Many methods are available for diagnostic testing. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) can be performed quickly and locally but has the potential for false-positive results in patients manifesting a positive EIA for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies and a negative EIA for immunoglobulin G (IgG). We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 405 patients with coccidioidal serologic testing performed between 1999 and 2003. Of 706 EIAs, 37 (5%) produced test results for 28 patients that showed isolated IgM positivity. Among these 28 patients, 24 (86%) had positive serologic findings by other methods (complement fixation or immunodiffusion or both), and 7 (25%) had positive microbiologic or histopathologic findings. All 4 (14%) patients without other positive serologic results had diagnostic tests with positive microbiologic or histopathologic results. No false-positive IgM assays were observed. We conclude that the false-positive rate of the EIA IgM is low, and that an isolated positive EIA IgM should prompt further follow-up and diagnostic testing.

Links

Publisher Full Text
doi.org
dx.doi.org
Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Blair JE
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Currier JT
No affiliation info available

MeSH

Antibodies, FungalCoccidioidesCoccidioidomycosisFalse Positive ReactionsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunoglobulin MPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18523863