Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 01; 39(19):1614-9.S

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we set out to assess the effect of preoperative depression on patient satisfaction after revision lumbar surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patient satisfaction ratings are increasingly being used in health care as a proxy for quality of care. In the elderly, affective disorders such as depression have been shown to influence patient-reported outcomes and self-interpretation of health status.

METHODS

A total of 69 patients aged 65 years or older undergoing revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent stenosis-associated back and leg pain were included in this study. Preoperative Zung self-rating depression score, comorbidities, and postoperative satisfaction with surgical care and outcome were assessed for all patients. Baseline and 2-year visual analogue scale (VAS)-leg pain, VAS-back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-12 physical component score and Short Form-12 mental component score, as well as health-state utility (EuroQol 5D) were assessed. Factors associated with patient satisfaction after surgical procedures were assessed via multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS-back pain 2.76±2.73 (pseudarthrosis [1.94±2.81], adjacent segment disease [4.35±3.16]), same-level recurrent stenosis [2±2.23]), VAS-leg pain 2.66±4.12, (adjacent segment disease [2.24±4.46] and same-level recurrent stenosis [3±3.78]). Two-year Oswestry Disability Index improved after surgery for pseudarthrosis (4.05±7.65), adjacent segment disease (6±13.63) and same-level recurrent stenosis (4.54±5.97). In a multivariate logistical regression model, increasing preoperative Zung self-rating depression scale scores were independently associated with patient dissatisfaction 2 years after revision lumbar surgery, (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that independent of surgical effectiveness, baseline depression influence patient satisfaction with health care, 2 years after revision lumbar surgery. Quality improvement initiatives using patient satisfaction as a proxy for quality of care should account for patients' baseline depression as a potential confounder especially in this age group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Links

Publisher Full Text
Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Adogwa O
*Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC †Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX; and ‡Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Carr K
No affiliation info available
Fatemi P
No affiliation info available
Verla T
No affiliation info available
Gazcon G
No affiliation info available
Gottfried O
No affiliation info available
Bagley C
No affiliation info available
Cheng J
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AgedBack PainComorbidityConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDecompression, SurgicalDepressionDepressive DisorderDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMalePain MeasurementPain, PostoperativePatient SatisfactionProstheses and ImplantsPsychologyRecovery of FunctionRecurrenceReoperationSmokingSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24921847