Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different medical treatment in advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma. Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective clinical study. Fifty-five advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma patients treated in Sun-Yat Sen University Cancer Center from January 2005 to August 2020 were enrolled. There were 34 patients who received first-line doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (doxorubicin group), 12 patients received first-line doxorubicin or liposome doxorubicin plus paclitaxel or albumin bound paclitaxel chemotherapy (combination therapy group), and 4 patients received first-line paclitaxel-based treatment (paclitaxel group). There were 6 patients who received anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy, another 2 patients received anti-PD-1 antibody plus anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy plus targeted therapy included 5 cases of first-line therapy and 3 cases of second-line therapy. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by RECIST 1.1 standard. The adverse reactions were evaluated by CTCAE4.0 standard. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was evaluated with Log rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the influencing factors. Results: There were 18 patients achieved partial response (PR) in 34 patients in the doxorubicin group, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.5 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was 15 months. Four patients achieved PR in 12 patients in the combination therapy group, mPFS and mOS were 4 months and 19 months. Two patients achieved PR in 4 patients in the paclitaxel group, mPFS and mOS were 3 months and 9 months. However, only 1 in 6 patients achieved PR for anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy, mPFS and mOS were 3 months and 16 months. Two patients who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy acquired PR for 17 months and more than 16 months. Median PFS (7.5 months) were longer in those with primary liver, lung and spleen angiosarcoma than in those with other primary site (3.0 months, P=0.028). The mOS (20 months) was longer in females than that in males (12 months, P=0.045). Primary tumor site, sex, age and treatment were not independent prognostic factors for angiosarcoma patients (P>0.05). Grade 3-4 cardiac toxicity was found in 2 patients in the combination therapy group. Conclusions: Doxorubicin-based and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy are the most important treatment for advanced angiosarcoma. Potential efficacy for targeted therapy combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy are showed in some patients with long duration of response and moderate adverse event.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the prognosis of the disease varied. This research aims to investigate the impact of serum lipid level on the outcome of DLBCL patients and their interaction with rituximab (RTX). Data of newly diagnosed DLBCL in the third affiliated hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively collected. Baseline serum lipid levels, clinical data, and survival information were simultaneously recorded. Data of healthy controls were collected with age matching. Serum lipid levels significantly differed for the patients. All were transformed into categorical variables for the analysis of survival. During a median follow-up of 58 months, 32.8% patients died. Univariate analysis revealed all serum lipid indicators were associated with overall survival (OS); all except for total cholesterol (TC) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) showed significant impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable analysis confirmed the adverse effect of triglyceride (TG) on PFS (P = 0.013) and favorable impact of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on OS (P = 0.003). For cases treated without RTX, apolipoprotein A (apoA) had independent favorable effect on both PFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.001). Comparably, for patients who received RTX, HDL showed remarkably predictive value of PFS (P = 0.011) and OS (P = 0.019). In conclusion, the abnormal serum lipids occurred throughout the course of DLBCL, and the associations of serum lipids and the prognosis of the disease were interfered by RTX. Trial registration: 2022()CL033; June 26, 2022, retrospectively registered.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is frequently treated with chemotherapy incorporating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP), which induces remission in 80% to 95% of cases. However, not all dogs derive meaningful benefit from CHOP, and prognostic factors for dogs with DLBCL are poorly defined. Serum thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) activity, a marker of tumour cell proliferation, has shown promising initial results as a prognostic biomarker in dogs with multicentric lymphomas. The purpose of this study was to determine if baseline serum TK1 activity is associated with clinical outcome in dogs with CHOP-treated DLBCL. Baseline serum TK1 activity was measured in banked sera from 98 dogs with CHOP-treated DLBCL using a commercially available ELISA kit. Data on other potential prognostic factors were abstracted retrospectively from electronic medical records. Multivariable statistical methods were used to identify associations between TK1 and other potential prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and attainment of complete remission. TK1 activity at baseline was not associated with PFS (p = .299) or attainment of complete remission (p = .910) following CHOP chemotherapy. Of the other prognostic factors analysed, only purebred (vs. mixed breed) status (HR 8.81, 95% CI 1.68-46.30, p = .010), attainment of complete (vs. partial) remission (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.49, p = .006), and baseline serum C-reactive protein concentration (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32, p = .001) were independently associated with PFS. Based on these findings, baseline serum TK1 activity does not appear to be a useful prognostic biomarker in dogs with CHOP-treated DLBCL.

In the phase 3 POLARIX study (NCT03274492), polatuzumab vedotin combined with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) with similar safety in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 6 cycles of Pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP plus 2 cycles of rituximab alone. For registration of POLARIX in China, consistency of PFS in an Asia subpopulation (defined as ≥50% of the risk reduction in PFS expected in the global population) was evaluated. Overall, 281 patients were analyzed: 160 patients from Asia in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of the global study and 121 from an ITT China extension cohort. Of these, 141 were randomized to Pola-R-CHP and 140 to R-CHOP. At data cut-off (June 28, 2021; median follow-up 24.2 months), PFS met the consistency definition with the global population and was superior with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (hazard ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-1.03). Two-year PFS was 74.2% (95% CI, 65.7-82.7) and 66.5% (95% CI, 57.3-75.6) with Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP, respectively. Safety was comparable between Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP, including rates of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs; 72.9% vs 66.2%, respectively), serious AEs (32.9% vs 32.4%), grade 5 AEs (1.4% vs 0.7%), AEs leading to study treatment discontinuation (5.0% vs 7.2%), and any-grade peripheral neuropathy (44.3% vs 50.4%). These findings demonstrate consistent efficacy and safety of Pola-R-CHP versus R‑CHOP in the Asian and global populations in POLARIX.

Background: Chemoimmunotherapy is safe and efficacious in treating many types of malignant tumors. However, clinical data demonstrating the effect of this combination treatment in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are currently limited. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced STS who failed previous systemic therapy. Methods: This was a single-center, single-arm, open-label phase II trial. Patients with unresectable or metastatic STS who had previously failed systemic therapy were enrolled. Patients received up to six cycles of doxorubicin and sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), while sintilimab treatment continued for up to 2 years. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological parameters and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 38 patients (20 men and 18 women) were enrolled in this study. The overall ORR was 39.5%, disease control rate was 71.1%, and the median PFS was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-8.5 months]. The adverse events (AEs) associated with the combined treatment were mild, manageable, and well-tolerated. The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were hematologic, including leukopenia (21.1%), anemia (18.4%), and thrombocytopenia (18.4%). Patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma had a significantly longer PFS than those with other pathological subtypes [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.83; p = 0.013]. There was no significant difference in the median PFS between patients who had previously received anthracycline-based chemotherapy and those who had not (HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.34-1.58, p = 0.43). Conclusion: Sintilimab plus doxorubicin is a safe and promising treatment for patients with advanced STS who have failed previous systemic therapy (including anthracycline-based chemotherapy). The efficacy of this combination therapy in UPS and dedifferentiated liposarcoma is superior to that in other sarcomas. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, registration number: ChiCTR1900027009.

Early identification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are likely to experience disease recurrence or refractory disease after rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) would be useful for improving risk-adapted treatment strategies. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) parameters at baseline, interim, and end of treatment (EOT). Methods: We analyzed the prognostic impact of FDG-PET/CT in 166 patients with DLBCL treated with a risk-adapted immunochemotherapy regimen. Scans were performed at baseline, after four cycles of R-CHOP or three cycles of RR-CHOP and one cycle of CHOP alone (interim) and six weeks after completing therapy (EOT). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and the impact of clinical/PET factors assessed with Cox models. We also assessed the predictive ability of the recently proposed International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI). Results: The median follow-up was 7.9 years. International Prognostic Index (IPI), baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and change in maximum standardized uptake value (∆SUVmax) at interim scans were statistically significant predictors for OS. Baseline MTV, interim ∆SUVmax, and EOT Deauville score were statistically significant predictors of PFS. Combining interim PET parameters demonstrated that patients with Deauville 4-5 and positive ∆SUVmax ≤ 70% at restaging (approximately 10% of the cohort) had extremely poor prognosis. The IMPI had limited discrimination and slightly overestimated the event rate in our cohort. Conclusion: Baseline MTV and interim ∆SUVmax predicted both PFS and OS with this sequential immunochemotherapy program. Combining interim Deauville score with interim ∆SUVmax may identify an extremely high-risk DLBCL population.

The Lugano classification for response assessment in lymphoma recommends the use of the 5-point-scale Deauville Score (DS) to assess response evaluation of end-of-treatment FDG-PET/CT (eotPET) in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL); nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on its accuracy and reproducibility. We focus here on the cohort of advanced stage IIb-IV HL patients enrolled in the HD0607 clinical trial (NCT identifier 00795613) that having had a negative interim PET performed 6 cycles of ABVD (Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine and Dacarbazine) and then performed an eotPET. Negative patients were randomized to radiotherapy and no further treatment while positive patients were treated based on local policies. eotPET was re-evaluated independently by two readers evaluated and progression free survival was analysed (PFS). eotPET of 254 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The best receiver operator characteristics cut-off values to distinguish positive and negative patients was 4. The area-under-the-curve was 0.81 (95%CI, 0.70-0.91). Three-years PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.97) in eotPET negative and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.43) in eotPET positive. DS demonstrated a good reproducibility of positivity/negativity between the readers consensus and local site evaluation where the agreement occurred on 95.0% of patients. The present study demonstrates that eotPET is an accurate tool to predict treatment outcome in HL and confirms the appropriateness of the Lugano classification for eotPET evaluation.

BACKGROUNDChronotherapy is a drug intervention at specific times of the day to optimize efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Its value in hematologic malignancy remains to be explored, in particular in adult patients.METHODSWe performed chronotherapeutic analysis using 2 cohorts of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing chemotherapy with a dichotomized schedule (morning or afternoon). The effect of a morning or afternoon schedule of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on survival and drug tolerability was evaluated in a survival cohort (n = 210) and an adverse event cohort (n = 129), respectively. Analysis of about 14,000 healthy individuals followed to identify the circadian variation in hematologic parameters.RESULTSBoth progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of female, but not male, patients were significantly shorter when patients received chemotherapy mostly in the morning (PFS HR 0.357, P = 0.033; and OS HR 0.141, P = 0.032). The dose intensity was reduced in female patients treated in the morning (cyclophosphamide 10%, P = 0.002; doxorubicin 8%, P = 0.002; and rituximab 7%, P = 0.003). This was mainly attributable to infection and neutropenic fever: female patients treated in the morning had a higher incidence of infections (16.7% vs. 2.4%) and febrile neutropenia (20.8% vs. 9.8%) as compared with those treated in the afternoon. The sex-specific chronotherapeutic effects can be explained by the larger daily fluctuation of circulating leukocytes and neutrophils in female than in male patients.CONCLUSIONIn female DLBCL patients, R-CHOP treatment in the afternoon can reduce toxicity while it improves efficacy and survival outcome.FUNDINGNational Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (grant number NRF-2021R1A4A2001553), Institute for Basic Science IBS-R029-C3, and Human Frontiers Science Program Organization Grant RGY0063/2017.

The incidence of aggressive B-cell lymphomas increases with age, but for elderly or frail patients not eligible for doxorubicin-containing treatment standard therapy remains to be defined. In this prospective, multicenter, phase-2 B-R-ENDA trial, we investigated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of 8 cycles rituximab combined with 6 cycles bendamustine (BR) in elderly or frail aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients: 39 patients aged >80 years and 29 patients aged 61-80 years with elevated Cumulative Illness Rating Scalescore >6 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28%-61%) and 46% (28%-63%) for the patients age >80, as well 32% (13%-51%) and 37% (17%-57%) for frail patients age 64-80, respectively. In a preplanned retrospective analysis, we found no significant differences in PFS and OS comparing the outcome of the 39 patients age >80 years with 40 patients aged 76-80 years treated with 6xR-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) and 2 x rituximab in the RICOVER-60 trial (DSHNHL 1999-1, NCT00052936, EU-20243), yet we detected lower rates of infections and treatment-related deaths in the BR-treated patients. We demonstrate that older and frail patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma who are not able to receive standard CHOP-based therapy can benefit from anthracycline-free therapy as a feasible and effective therapeutic option.

In this post hoc subgroup analysis of 200 patients enrolled in China from the phase III PHOENIX trial (N = 838, NCT01855750), addition of ibrutinib to rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) did not improve event-free survival (EFS) versus placebo+R-CHOP in the intent-to-treat (ITT; n = 200, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·509-1.349; p = 0.4495) or activated B-cell-like (ABC; n = 141 [based on available gene-expression profiling data], HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.467-1.570; p = 0.6160) subpopulations. However, ibrutinib+R-CHOP improved EFS (HR = 0·50, 95% CI: 0.251-1.003) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.228-1.009) versus placebo+R-CHOP in patients aged <60 but not ≥60 years. Grade ≥3 serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more with ibrutinib+R-CHOP (45·6% vs. 31·3%). The percentage of patients receiving ≥6 cycles of R-CHOP was similar across treatment arms in those <60 years. A numerical trend was seen towards improved EFS and PFS with ibrutinib+R-CHOP versus placebo+R-CHOP in patients with MYC-high/BCL2-high co-expression. In this slightly younger Chinese subgroup, ibrutinib+R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT and ABC subpopulations but improved outcomes with manageable safety in patients <60 years, consistent with overall PHOENIX study outcomes.

Background: The Platinum-based combination has been proven to have an outstanding effect on patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), but the best scientific combination has not been established yet. The present study is aimed to seek the best treatment plan for PSROC. Methods: We did a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, during which lite before March 2022 were retrieved on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled databases. We included randomized controlled clinical trials comparing chemotherapy combinations with other treatments for patients with PSROC. The important outcomes concerned were progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary outcome), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and AEs-related discontinuation. All outcomes were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Results: 26 trials involving 10441 patients were retrieved in this study. For the initial treatment of PSROC, carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus bevacizumab had the best PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% credible interval (CI) 0.51-0.68]; Carboplatin plus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab resulted in the best OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.35) and ORR [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.35]. For the maintenance therapy in PSROC, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) following platinum-based chemotherapy provided the best PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61-0.68), the highest frequency of adverse events of grade three or higher (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.44) but the treatment discontinuation was generally low. Subgroup analysis suggested that trabectedin plus PLD was comparable to single platinum in prolonging PFS in the platinum-free interval (6-12 months). Conclusion: Both platinum-based chemotherapy plus PARPi and platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had higher survival benefits than other treatments in PSROC. Trabectedin plus PLD might be a potential alternative treatment strategy for the partially platinum-sensitive subpopulation with intolerance to platinum. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?], identifier [CRD42022326573].

Obinutuzumab (G) has become part of front-line treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) based on results of a large randomized study. Data on patients treated outside of clinical trials are lacking. We have retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of G-based immunochemotherapy regimens in 114 patients treated in a real-life setting during a period of 2 years, largely coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The response rate was 93.8%; 18-months overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 88% and 84%, respectively. Patients treated with G-cyclophosphamide, vincristine and glucocorticoid + doxorubicine (CHOP) had statistically significantly superior OS and PFS compared to patients treated with G-bendamustine (G-B) (P = 0.002 and P = 0.006, respectively) due to an increase in lethal infections, most notably COVID-19, in the latter group. A total of 12 patients died during follow-up; 9 of 61 treated with G-B, 1 of 49 treated with G-CHOP and 2 of 4 treated with G-cyclophosphamide, vincristine and glucocorticoid (CVP). SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in 20 (17.5%) patients. All of the 7 treated with G-CHOP recovered, while 4 of 12 treated with G-B died. Immunoglobulin levels and severity of neutropenia were similar between the groups. In multivariate analysis, G-B in comparison to G-CHOP was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.044, hazard ratio = 9.81) after adjustment for age, sex and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Based on our experience G has excellent antilymphoma activity in patients receiving front-line treatment for FL in real-life setting, but during the COVID-19 pandemic, it should be preferentially combined with CHOP, at least in patients younger than 65.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a very rare endocrine cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. There is a paucity of randomized clinical trials for this rare disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature on systemic therapy options in different stages of ACC. A systematic review was performed using Pubmed and Embase databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 24 trials of systemic therapy in the treatment of ACC were identified and included in this review. Only one clinical trial in the adjuvant setting was identified, the negative phase III trial ADIUVO, which tested mitotane in low to intermediate-risk ACC patients. In the treatment of advanced ACC, cisplatin-based chemotherapy was evaluated in small and non-randomized phase II trials, and response rates ranged from 21% to 53.5%. The phase III trial FIRM-ACT compared etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and mitotane versus treatment with streptozotocin and mitotane and showed no difference in OS, but higher RR and PFS were reported with the multi-drug regimen. Six clinical trials of immunotherapy and seven studies of targeted therapy in advanced ACC were included, with modest activity and no phase 3 trials were identified. Treatment recommendations of ACC are based on retrospective and small studies with limited systemic therapy options. International and multi-center collaboration is essential to expand clinical research and improve outcomes.

Patients with double- and triple-hit lymphomas (DHL/THL) have inferior outcomes with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), and higher-intensity regimens such as dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH-R are standard. Dose-intensification of DA-EPOCH-R is guided by hematologic toxicity, without conclusive benefit for DHL/THL patients. To determine if cumulative doses of DA-EPOCH-R or compliance with dose adjustment impacts survival, we retrospectively evaluated detailed clinical data from 109 adult (age ≥18 years) patients with DHL/THL treated with ≥4 cycles of induction DA-EPOCH-R from 2014 to 2019 at six centers. A comprehensive multivariate analysis was performed. Survival outcomes for the entire cohort were comparable to historical estimates for DHL/THL treated with this regimen (median follow-up 27.9 months). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly associated with cumulative chemotherapy dose, dose escalation, or compliance with dose adjustment. Heterogeneous dosing practices were observed. Prospective investigation is warranted to evaluate the practice of dose adjustment of R-EPOCH for patients with DHL/THL.

Recent reports indicate that patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas might benefit if concomitantly receiving statins with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine (Oncovin) and prednisone immunochemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 130 newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with unfavorable clinical features treated with first-line rituximab, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine [Oncovin], cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin (R-DA-EPOCH) immunochemotherapy in period 2005-2019. A total of 17/130 (13.1%) patients received statins concomitantly with immunochemotherapy, mostly atorvastatin and in intermediate statin dose intensity. Besides tendency to be associated with older age (p = 0.070), there were no other significant associations of statins use with neither sex, disease stage, R-IPI, or other unfavorable disease features (p > 0.05 for all analyses). Also, no significant differences were present considering feasibility (number of cycles with dose escalation/reduction), toxicity (number of cycles with anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and septic complications) nor efficacy (response rates) of R-DA-EPOCH regimen (p > 0.05 for all analyses). Also, statin use had no significant association with neither OS (p = 0.480) nor PFS (p = 0.891). Lack of associations of statin use with relevant clinical outcomes was further corroborated by multivariate analyses.