Angioedema results from the decreased degradation of vasoactive peptides such as substance P and bradykinin. In this study, we sought to clarify whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors that suppress the degradation of substance P and bradykinin are involved in angioedema onset. We calculated information coefficients (ICs) by performing a disproportionality analysis to evaluate DPP-4/ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. No angioedema signals were detected for DPP-4 inhibitors; however, a signal was detected for ACE inhibitors (IC: 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19 to 2.65). Of the patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors, four developed drug-induced angioedema in combination with ACE inhibitors, and all were taking vildagliptin. Signals were detected for enalapril (IC: 2.39, 95% CI: 2.06 to 2.71), imidapril (IC: 2.83, 95% CI: 2.38 to 3.27), lisinopril (IC: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.00), temocapril (IC: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.29 to 2.40), and trandolapril (IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.19 to 2.95). Both inhibitors inhibited the degradation of substance P and bradykinin and were thus expected to cause angioedema. However, no signal of angioedema was detected with the DPP-4 inhibitors, in contrast to some ACE inhibitors. This study found that ACE inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors, which inhibit the degradation of substance P and bradykinin, tended to have different effects on the onset of angioedema in clinical practice.

This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once- versus twice-daily administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for the management of hypertension. A literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar was performed (January 1980 to June 2020) using the following search terms: ACE inhibitors, lisinopril, enalapril, fosinopril, trandolapril, ramipril, perindopril, captopril, benazepril, ambulatory blood pressure, hypertension, twice-daily dosing, once-daily dosing. Reference lists from retrieved articles were examined for additional reports. Relevant English-language studies or those conducted in humans were considered. Overall, six studies were included that compared the efficacy of once-daily to twice-daily dosing of ACE inhibitors. Similar blood pressure-lowering effects, and, in some studies, greater blood pressure lowering has been noted in the twice-daily administration arm than once-daily administration of ACE inhibitors. ACE inhibitors' pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties play an integral role in determining the expected blood pressure-lowering outcome. It is noteworthy that adherence issues may arise when transitioning from a once-daily regimen to a twice-daily regimen. There appear to be no added safety concerns between twice-daily and once-daily administration of ACE inhibitors regarding safety outcomes. After reviewing the available literature, twice-daily dosing of ACE inhibitors may promote added blood pressure-lowering effects, with the advantages of reducing cost, reducing the risk of drug-drug interactions, reducing polypharmacy, and reducing patient confusion about their medications. Recommendations for twice-daily administration of ACE -inhibitors should be made via shared decision-making with the patient, and clinician judgment, to drive treatment selection.

Chronic volume overload induces multiple cardiac remodeling processes that finally result in eccentric cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. We have hypothesized that chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition by trandolapril might affect various remodeling processes differentially, thus allowing their dissociation. Cardiac remodeling due to chronic volume overload and the effects of trandolapril were investigated in rats with an aortocaval fistula (ACF rats). The aortocaval shunt was created using a needle technique and progression of cardiac remodeling to heart failure was followed for 24 weeks. In ACF rats, pronounced eccentric cardiac hypertrophy and contractile and proarrhythmic electrical remodeling were associated with increased mortality. Trandolapril substantially reduced the electrical proarrhythmic remodeling and mortality, whereas the effect on cardiac hypertrophy was less pronounced and significant eccentric hypertrophy was preserved. Effective suppression of electrical proarrhythmic remodeling and mortality but not hypertrophy indicates that the beneficial therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitor trandolapril in volume overload heart failure might be dissociated from pure antihypertrophic effects.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, famous as COVID-19, has recently emerged as a novel virus and imposed an unrecoverable loss to global health and the economy. At present, no effective drug against COVID-19 is available and currently available viral drugs targeting the viral key proteins of related RNA viruses have been found ineffective against COVID-19. This study evaluated the inhibitors of the viral proteases and other structural proteins, including Mpro (Main protease), RdRp (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase), and spike glycoprotein from synthetic and herbal sources. The molecular docking-based approach was used to identify and evaluate the putative inhibitors of key proteins involved in viral replication and survival. Furthermore, the pharmaceutical properties of these inhibitors were explored to predict the drug suitability as a therapeutic agent against COVID-19 by considering adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) using Lipinski's rule or SwissADME. Trandolapril, Benazepril, and Moexipril were evaluated as the best non-carcinogenic and non-toxic potential inhibitors of spike glycoprotein, Mpro, and RdRp, respectively. The drugs showed significant binding affinities against the active sites of respective SARS_CoV-2 target proteins; hence, they can be used as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19.

Controlling the microstructure of materials by means of phase separation is a versatile tool for optimizing material properties. Phase separation has been exploited to fabricate intricate microstructures in many fields including cell biology, tissue engineering, optics, and electronics. The aim of this study was to use phase separation to tailor the spatial location of drugs and thereby generate release profiles of drug payload over periods ranging from 1 week to months by exploiting different mechanisms: polymer degradation, polymer diluent dissolution, and control of microstructure. To achieve this, we used drop-on-demand inkjet three-dimensional (3D) printing. We predicted the microstructure resulting from phase separation using high-throughput screening combined with a model based on the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter and were able to show that drug release from 3D-printed objects can be predicted from observations based on single drops of mixtures. We demonstrated for the first time that inkjet 3D printing yields controllable phase separation using picoliter droplets of blended photoreactive oligomers/monomers. This new understanding gives us hierarchical compositional control, from droplet to device, allowing release to be "dialled up" without manipulation of device geometry. We exemplify this approach by fabricating a biodegradable, long-term, multiactive drug delivery subdermal implant ("polyimplant") for combination therapy and personalized treatment of coronary heart disease. This is an important advance for implants that need to be delivered by cannula, where the shape is highly constrained and thus the usual geometrical freedoms associated with 3D printing cannot be easily exploited, which brings a hitherto unseen level of understanding to emergent material properties of 3D printing.

Hypertension is a recognized comorbidity for COVID-19. The association of antihypertensive medications with outcomes in patients with hypertension is not fully described. However, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), responsible for host entry of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) leading to COVID-19, is postulated to be upregulated in patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Here, we evaluated the occurrence of pulmonary adverse drug events (ADEs) in patients with hypertension receiving ACEIs/ARBs to determine if disparities exist between individual drugs within the respective classes using data from the FDA Spontaneous Reporting Systems. For this purpose, we proposed the proportional reporting ratio to provide a statistical summary for the commonality of an ADE for a specific drug as compared to the entire database for drugs in the same or other classes. In addition, a statistical procedure, multiple logistic regression analysis, was employed to correct hidden confounders when causative covariates are underreported or untrusted to correct analyses of drug-ADE combinations. To date, analyses have been focused on drug classes rather than individual drugs which may have different ADE profiles depending on the underlying diseases present. A retrospective analysis of thirteen pulmonary ADEs showed significant differences associated with quinapril and trandolapril, compared to other ACEIs and ARBs. Specifically, quinapril and trandolapril were found to have a statistically significantly higher incidence of pulmonary ADEs compared with other ACEIs as well as ARBs (P < 0.0001) for group comparison (i.e., ACEIs vs. ARBs vs. quinapril vs. trandolapril) and (P ≤ 0.0007) for pairwise comparison (i.e., ACEIs vs. quinapril, ACEIs vs. trandolapril, ARBs vs. quinapril, or ARBs vs. trandolapril). This study suggests that specific members of the ACEI antihypertensive class (quinapril and trandolapril) have a significantly higher cluster of pulmonary ADEs.

Trandolapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prodrug, needs to be activated by carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) in the liver to exert its intended therapeutic effect. A previous in vitro study demonstrated that the CES1 genetic variant G143E (rs71647871) abolished CES1-mediated trandolapril activation in cells transfected with the variant. This study aimed to determine the effect of the G143E variant on trandolapril activation in human livers and the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) in human subjects. We performed an in vitro incubation study to assess trandolapril activation in human livers (5 G143E heterozygotes and 97 noncarriers) and conducted a single-dose (1 mg) PK and PD study of trandolapril in healthy volunteers (8 G143E heterozygotes and 11 noncarriers). The incubation study revealed that the mean trandolapril activation rate in G143E heterozygous livers was 42% of those not carrying the variant (p = 0.0015). The clinical study showed that, relative to noncarriers, G143E carriers exhibited 20% and 15% decreases, respectively, in the peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0-72 h) of the active metabolite trandolaprilat, although the differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the average maximum reductions of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in carriers were ~ 22% and 23% less than in noncarriers, respectively, but the differences did not reach a statistically significant level. In summary, the CES1 G143E variant markedly impaired trandolapril activation in the human liver under the in vitro incubation conditions; however, this variant had only a modest impact on the PK and PD of trandolapril in healthy human subjects.

Maintaining regular blood pressure control usually requires multidrug regimens rather than monotherapy. The objective of this study was to describe the effectiveness and safety of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker in a single-tablet combination in patients with hypertension, a heart rate higher than 70 beats/min, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study was conducted in Turkey as a prospective, noninterventional, observational study. At 22 clinical sites, the data of 200 patients with hypertension were used for efficacy analysis; however, 262 patients received at least one dose of trandolapril/verapamil fixed-dose combination at two dose strengths. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, PR interval, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and albumin/creatinine ratios were recorded during 8 weeks of treatment. With treatment, the mean (±SD) SBP that was recorded as 162.8 (±14.642) mm Hg at baseline was reduced to 131.7 ± 11.1 mm Hg at week 8 (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean DBP was reduced from 93.76 ± 9.16 mm Hg to 77.6 ± 7.6 mm Hg (p < 0.001). Following 8 weeks of treatment, SBP and DBP values were reduced below 140 mm Hg and 90 mm Hg in most patients (81.5%), respectively. The mean heart rate as evaluated using electrocardiography measurements was reduced to 78.25 beats/min at week 8 as compared with baseline during trandolapril/verapamil single-pill combination treatment (p < 0.001). Treatment with trandolapril and verapamil was well tolerated over 8 weeks with no unexpected safety signals. In conclusion, the single-pill combination of trandolapril and verapamil was considered effective in reducing and controlling blood pressure in patients with hypertension and T2DM. There was a significant improvement in HbA1c and ACR levels in a smaller subgroup of the patient cohort. The trandolapril/verapamil combination was evaluated as being safe and well-tolerated following a treatment period of 8 weeks. This trial was registered with NCT02298556.

Simultaneous administration of certain antihypertensive (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and diuretics) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a renal toxicity syndrome known as "triple whammy" acute kidney injury (TW-AKI), yet poorly characterized at the pathophysiological level, as no specific experimental model exists on which to conduct preclinical research. Herein, we generated and characterized a rat model of TW-AKI (0.7 mg/kg/day trandolapril +400 mg/kg/day ibuprofen +20 mg/kg/day furosemide). Double treatments involving the NSAID caused a subclinical acute kidney injury, as they reduced glomerular filtration rate to a significant but not sufficient extent to increase Crpl concentration. Only the triple treatment generated an overt AKI with increased Crpl provided that animals were under partial water ingestion restriction. Histological examination revealed no evidence of tissue renal injury, and no proteinuria or makers of renal damage were detected in the urine. These findings, along with a normal fractional excretion of sodium and glucose, indicated that these drug combinations produce a prerenal type of AKI. In fact, blood pressure and renal blood flow were also reduced (most markedly following the triple combination), although renal dysfunction was more pronounced than expected for the corresponding pressure drop, supporting a key pathological role of the interference with renal autoregulation mechanisms. In summary, prerenal TW-AKI only occurs when volemia is challenged (i.e., by furosemide in partially water-deprived animals) under the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and NSAIDs. This model will facilitate further pathophysiological knowledge for a better diagnosis and clinical handling of this syndrome.

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are a widely used class of antihypertensive medications that act by blocking the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, thus inhibiting an intermediate step in the renin-angiotensin pathway. The ACE inhibitors are rare causes of clinically apparent liver injury. The ACE inhibitors act by blocking the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, the active peptide that causes the vasoconstriction and sodium retention induced by activation of the renin-angiotensin pathway. The ACE inhibitors are considered first line drugs for the therapy of hypertension and are considered particularly helpful in preventing the renal complications of diabetes and high blood pressure. ACE inhibitors are sometimes used even in patients with relatively normal blood pressure for treatment of heart failure and prevention of diabetic neuropathy. Currently, there are 10 ACE inhibitors approved for use in the United States: captopril (Capoten: 1981), enalapril (Vasotec: 1985), lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril: 1987), benazepril (Lotensin: 1991), fosinopril (Monopril: 1991), quinapril (Accupril: 1991), ramipril (Altase: 1991), perindopril (Aceon: 1993), moexipril (Univasc: 1995), and trandolapril (Mavik: 1996). All of the currently used ACE inhibitors are associated with a low rate of serum enzyme elevations during chronic therapy (0.2% to 2%) which is minimally different from the rate of elevations during placebo therapy. The aminotransferase elevations are usually mild-to-moderate in severity, self limited, and rarely require dose modification or drug discontinuation.

Trandolapril is an oral angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor used in the therapy of hypertension and heart failure. Trandolapril is associated with a low rate of transient serum aminotransferase elevations, but has yet to be linked to instances of acute liver injury.

Complement activation has been increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and its chronic complications. It is unknown whether complement factor H (CFH) genetic variants, which have been previously associated with complement-mediated organ damage likely due to inefficient complement modulation, influence the risk of renal and cardiovascular events and response to therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in type 2 diabetic patients. Here, we have analyzed the c.2808G>T, (p.Glu936Asp) CFH polymorphism, which tags the H3 CFH haplotype associated to low plasma factor H levels and predisposing to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, in 1,158 type 2 diabetics prospectively followed in the Bergamo nephrologic complications of type 2 diabetes randomized, controlled clinical trial (BENEDICT) that evaluated the effect of the ACEi trandolapril on new onset microalbuminuria. At multivariable Cox analysis, the p.Glu936Asp polymorphism (Asp/Asp homozygotes, recessive model) was associated with increased risk of microalbuminuria [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 3.25 (95% CI 1.46-7.24), P = 0.0038] and cardiovascular events [adjusted HR 2.68 (95% CI 1.23-5.87), P = 0.013]. The p.Glu936Asp genotype significantly interacted with ACEi therapy in predicting microalbuminuria. ACEi therapy was not nephroprotective in Asp/Asp homozygotes [adjusted HR 1.54 (0.18-13.07), P = 0.691 vs. non-ACEi-treated Asp/Asp patients], whereas it significantly reduced microalbuminuria events in Glu/Asp or Glu/Glu patients [adjusted HR 0.38 (0.24-0.60), P < 0.0001 vs. non-ACEi-treated Glu/Asp or Glu/Glu patients]. Among ACEi-treated patients, the risk of developing cardiovascular events was higher in Asp/Asp homozygotes than in Glu/Asp or Glu/Glu patients [adjusted HR 3.26 (1.29-8.28), P = 0.013]. Our results indicate that type 2 diabetic patients Asp/Asp homozygotes in the p.Glu936Asp CFH polymorphism are at increased risk of microalbuminuria and cardiovascular complications and may be less likely to benefit from ACEi therapy. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.

We found recently that in Ren-2 transgenic hypertensive rats (TGR) addition of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor (sEHi) to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), surprisingly, increased the mortality due to heart failure (HF) induced by creation of the aorto-caval fistula (ACF). Since TGR exhibit sex-related differences in mortality, we examined here if such differentiation exists also in the response to the treatment with ACEi (trandolapril), alone or combined with sEHi [cis-4-[4-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)cyclohexyloxy]benzoic acid, (c-AUCB)]. ACEi improved survival in males to 74 % (vs. 0 %) and in females to 65 % (vs. 32 %). ACEi and sEHi combined also improved the survival in male ACF TGR, however, it was significantly less (38 %) than after ACEi alone. In contrast, in females the combined treatment significantly improved the final survival rate (84 %). There were no significant sex-linked differences in survival rate in untreated or treated normotensive Hannover Sprague-Dawley rats. In conclusion, in HF patients with co-existing hypertension and RAS hyperactivity, the sex may co-determine the rate of HF progression, and can influence the effectiveness of the therapeutic measures applied. Therefore, in the relevant pre-clinical studies the sex-linked differences should be seriously considered. Our data indicate that TGR might be an optimal model for such studies.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN), defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 using three or more drugs or controlled BP (<140/90) using four or more drugs, is associated with adverse outcomes, including decline in kidney function. We conducted a genome-wide association analysis in 1194 White and Hispanic participants with hypertension and coronary artery disease from the INternational VErapamil-SR Trandolapril STudy-GENEtic Substudy (INVEST-GENES). Top variants associated with RHTN at p < 10-4 were tested for replication in 585 White and Hispanic participants with hypertension and subcortical strokes from the Secondary Prevention of Subcortical Strokes GENEtic Substudy (SPS3-GENES). A genetic risk score for RHTN was created by summing the risk alleles of replicated RHTN signals. rs11749255 in MSX2 was associated with RHTN in INVEST (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) = 1.50 (1.2-1.8), p = 7.3 × 10-5) and replicated in SPS3 (OR = 2.0 (1.4-2.8), p = 4.3 × 10-5), with genome-wide significance in meta-analysis (OR = 1.60 (1.3-1.9), p = 3.8 × 10-8). Other replicated signals were in IFLTD1 and PTPRD. IFLTD1 rs6487504 was associated with RHTN in INVEST (OR = 1.90 (1.4-2.5), p = 1.1 × 10-5) and SPS3 (OR = 1.70 (1.2-2.5), p = 4 × 10-3). PTPRD rs324498, a previously reported RHTN signal, was among the top signals in INVEST (OR = 1.60 (1.3-2.0), p = 3.4 × 10-5) and replicated in SPS3 (OR = 1.60 (1.1-2.4), one-sided p = 0.005). Participants with the highest number of risk alleles were at increased risk of RHTN compared to participants with a lower number (p-trend = 1.8 × 10-15). Overall, we identified and replicated associations with RHTN in the MSX2, IFLTD1, and PTPRD regions, and combined these associations to create a genetic risk score.