Patient decisions to bypass the closest labor & delivery (L&D) facility in favor of other birthing locations can have consequences for the provision of health care in rural and micropolitan areas as patient volumes decline and payer mixes change. Among 220 589 uncomplicated births in Iowa, we document characteristics of birth parents who bypass their closest birthing facility, show how this bypassing behavior results in changed travel times to delivery facilities across the rural/urban divide, and indicate the parts of the state where bypassing behavior is most prevalent. From 2013 to 2019, 55.2% of deliveries occurred in facilities that were further from birthing parents' residences than the closest L&D facility. Bypassing is associated with White, non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, and private insurance status. Although bypassing is least common among micropolitan birth parents, this group has the greatest travel burden to birthing facilities and exhibits increasing rates of bypassing over time. Perinatal quality improvement programs can target locations and populations where low-risk birthing parents can be encouraged to deliver close to home if medically appropriate, particularly in small towns and rural areas. This can potentially alleviate the risk of obstetric deserts by ensuring L&D units maintain patient volumes necessary to continue operations.

The purpose of this document is to highlight practical recommendations to assist acute-care hospitals in prioritization and implementation of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals through Hand Hygiene, published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the American Hospital Association, and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

We validated  different coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) encounter definitions across 2 urgent care clinics. Sensitivity of definitions varied throughout the pandemic. Inclusion of COVID-19 and COVID-19-like illness (CLI) ICD-10s rendered highest sensitivity but lowest specificity. Antibiotic prescribing rates were low for COVID-19 ICD-10 encounters, increasing with CLI ICD-10 encounters.

Background A stroke is an emergency medical condition that needs to be treated promptly. Patients who suffer from stroke frequently experience varying degrees of impairment, necessitating emergency hospital treatment and prolonged home care. It can lower the quality of life which leads to social isolation and makes it harder to function independently. The purpose of this research was to assess the health issues and functional capacity of individuals living with stroke. Methodology An exploratory study was conducted in the neurological outpatient department of tertiary care hospitals in Chennai. A total of 30 post-stroke participants were selected using a convenient sampling technique. Data were collected by structured interviews using the Post-Stroke Checklist and Barthel Index. The data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The majority of the patients were (86.7%) men in the age group of 55-65 years. Regarding the health problems identified with the Post-Stroke Checklist, the activities of daily living (80%) were the most common, and spasticity (48%) and pain (34%) were the least common. However, 60% of the participants had new problems related to vision, 66% had problems with hearing, 76% had problems with getting around inside or outside, and 60% had a history of a recent fall. Further, 52% had problems with remembering and concentrating on things, 72% had problems sleeping, and 45% were worried about their relationship with their spouse after the stroke. The median Barthel Index score was 43.5. Conclusions More than half of all stroke survivors were dependent on others for everyday activities. We recommend that a well-designed and focused assessment is needed to identify the functional ability and stroke-related health problems among individuals by all healthcare professionals for the successful rehabilitation of stroke survivors.

Patients with acute type A aortic dissection who arrive at hospitals that lack the facilities to treat them must be transferred to a tertiary care facility to receive treatment. The transfer process involves a checkpoint at which the transfer is accepted or denied. Delays in making this decision may lead to suboptimal health outcomes. In light of this, the goal of this project was to devise a way to reduce the time to decision of transfer requests for patients with an acute type A aortic dissection. The project followed the Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) approach. To better understand the process, data were obtained from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center regarding reasons for patient transfer cancellation and the average time until a transfer was denied or accepted. After data analysis, a fishbone diagram was used to display 23 root causes of the delays in time to decision of the transfer request. These were narrowed down to the following four significant causes using a nominal voting technique: (1) no standard on disease-specific information for the handoff, (2) lack of a real-time database, (3) incompatible electronic health record system between facilities, and (4) multiple communication handoffs causing confusion. Solutions to each root cause were evaluated using a solution selection matrix. The final two solutions proposed for implementation were as follows: (1) to establish checklists of required documents and patient transfer criteria and (2) to create a regional database to provide real-time information on hospital capacity.

The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the past few decades. A significant proportion of this increase is from low to middle income countries (LMIC). CRC prevalence is also increasing in North and Central Asian Countries (NCAC). Screening for colorectal cancer has decreased CRC mortality but data regarding screening practices in NCAC is limited.  A literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane for current colorectal cancer screening practices in NCAC. Incidence and mortality rates were derived from public health agency websites to calculate age-standardized CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios. Web-based online break-point testing defined as statistical major changes in CRC mortality trends was completed. Among the 677 screened studies, 37 studies met the criteria for inclusion for review. CRC screening in NCAC is not organized, although most countries have cancer registries. The data availability is scarce, and most data is prior to 2017. Most studies are observational. There is minimal data about colonoscopy preparations, adenoma detection and complications rates. The polyp detection rates (PDRs) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs) seem low to optimal in this region. Commonly measured outcomes include participation rate, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) positivity rate and cost-benefit measures. Lower mortality-to-incidence ratios is seen in countries with screening programs. Kazakhstan and Lithuania with screening programs have achieved breakpoint suggesting major changes in CRC mortality trends. Data about CRC screening varies widely within NCAC. High human developmental index (HDI) countries like Lithuania and Estonia have higher incidence of CRC and mortality. Seven NCAC have CRC screening programs with most utilizing non-invasive methods for screening. Data collection is regional and not organized. The ADR and PDR are low to optimal in this region and cancer detection rates are comparable to other high-income countries (HIC). CRC detection rate is 0.05% for screening in Kazakhstan and 0.2% for screening in Lithuania. Very limited information is available on the actual cost and logistics of implementing a CRC screening program. All NCAC have a cancer registry, with some having a high-quality registry showing national coverage with good validity and completeness. Establishing guideline-based registries and increasing screening efficacy could improve CRC outcomes in NCAC.

Introduction Population health is crucial to government planning. The 2030 national vision is transforming all Saudi sectors. The health sector revolution intends to boost life expectancy by reducing mortality due to road traffic accidents and morbidity due to chronic illness. Health services will change from treatment-based to person-centered and preventive care, empower the population, increase access to healthcare and improve service quality by offering high customer satisfaction. This study establishes a baseline assessment for public awareness, behavior, healthcare access, and quality. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Aseer region in southwestern Saudi Arabia in 2022, September and October. Using the Aseer region's 2.1 million people to calculate the sample needed, the minimal sample size was 664. The study used cluster random sampling and a structured self-administered questionnaire to meet health transformation strategy requirements. All study variables underwent descriptive and bivariate analysis. Result The survey received 1,381 responses, with 97.2% of participants being Saudi and 84.4% being male. 312 (22.6%) of participants self-reported their health status as weak; 615 (44.5%) self-reported as having a good health status; and 667 (48.3%) reported having high knowledge. 740 people (53.6%) said that health was very important in their daily lives. The evaluation rate for Ministry of Health services in primary healthcare centers was 585 (42.4%) medium and 398 (28.8%) media for inpatient services. Evaluation for surgical procedure availability was 388 (28.1%) media. The results showed there is a statistically significant relationship (p-value < 0.05) between health status and age, gender, knowledge, and the importance of a healthy lifestyle. And there is a statistically significant relationship between the availability and quality of the health service profile, including inpatient, outpatient, and virtual care. Nationality appears to be statistically insignificant. Conclusion Health promotion is effective because people are health conscious. The importance of health and lifestyle presents a tremendous opportunity to incorporate health into all policies and improve the availability of healthy lifestyle options and surroundings to support healthy behaviors that will reduce preventable disease and risk mortality and morbidity. Health status was also linked to healthcare availability and quality.

Mental well-being is associated with many mental health symptoms, including depression and health-related quality of life. Digital divide could impact mental health, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information and communication technology (ICT)-based tools and interventions could effectively provide social support. Intergenerational mentoring between college students and older adults could promote eHealth literacy and self-efficacy, and it is advocated to bridge the digital divide for older adults. However, the effectiveness of an intervention which employs ICT-based tools and intergenerational mentoring strategies (i.e. Digital Buddy) on mental well-being is unclear.