Adalimumab is a TNF specific monoclonal widely used therapeutically. Monitoring adalimumab levels is important for guiding treatment strategies and is predominantly performed using an ELISA. The homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA) has many advantages over an ELISA for adalimumab monitoring but current HMSA methodologies do not discriminate between adalimumab and other TNF specific monoclonals such as infliximab. The development and validation of a competitive binding HMSA (cHMSA) specific for adalimumab is reported here. The cHMSA had a lower limit of quantitation of 1.25 μg/ml and the intra-assay and inter-assay coefficents of variation (CV) were <20%. No signal was detected in adalimumab naïve control serum including those containing rheumatoid factor or infliximab. The majority (14/20) of adalimumab patient samples containing anti-adalimumab antibodies gave a cHMSA signal >3 standard deviations lower than the controls. The performance of the cHMSA and an ELISA was compared using adalimumab patient samples (n = 82). There was a strong correlation between the assays (r = 0.91) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (0.88) was indicative of good-excellent inter-assay reliability. Bland-Altman plots showed little overall bias and comparison of the sub-groups defined using cut-points (1.25 or 7.3 μg/ml) gave percent agreement (>90%) and Cohens kappa (95% CI: 0.61-0.93) values indicative of substantial-almost perfect agreement. These results demonstrate that cHMSA provides an accurate and specific method for monitoring adalimumab levels and can additionally provide an initial screen for the presence of anti-adalimumab antibodies.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is widely accepted as the operation of choice for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), UC with dysplasia or cancer, or familial adenomatous polyposis. Pouchitis is the most frequent complication after IPAA for UC. Although the pathogenesis of pouchitis remains unclear, current evidence suggests that dysbiosis and mucosal immune response are important mechanisms. Antibiotics are the first-line treatment for the condition, but some patients develop chronic refractory pouchitis. Such cases can be treated with regimens such as longer courses of antibiotic combinations, mesalazine, corticosteroids, probiotics, or biologics. But if pouch inflammation is not ameliorated, a permanent ileostomy may be required. A 40-year-old man had undergone IPAA for UC and was diagnosed with pouchitis according to the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Antibiotics, mesalazine, and corticosteroids were given, but the inflammation was difficult to control. He developed chronic refractory pouchitis associated with perianal abscesses and anal fistulae. Following a seton procedure for fistulae, adalimumab (ADA) was administered. After 42 weeks, the ulcers in the pouch became scarred, and the anal fistulae were closed endoscopically. After remission was induced, it has been maintained. ADA is a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody that has been successfully used to treat refractory Crohn disease of the ileoanal pouch. Although some studies report that infliximab, a chimeric anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, is efficacious in patients with refractory pouchitis, clinical evidence for the use of ADA is limited. This case illustrates achievement of induction and maintenance of remission of refractory pouchitis with ADA. It is possible that patients with this condition can avoid a permanent ileostomy with anti-TNF-α therapy. In the near future, further study of long-term clinical outcomes of anti-TNF-α therapy is expected.

Uveitis is an inflammatory disorder of the uveal tract of the eye that can affect both adults and children. Non-infectious uveitis can be an expression of a systemic autoimmune condition, or it can be idiopathic. It is a serious disease, associated with possible severe complications leading to visual impairment and blindness. For this reason, a prompt diagnosis and assessment of an appropriate treatment, with the collaboration of specialists such as ophthalmologists and rheumatologists, are extremely important. Many treatment options may be associated to side effects; therefore, clinicians should follow a stepladder approach starting with the least aggressive treatments to induce remission of inflammation. In this review, we reported the current evidence-based treatments for non-infectious uveitis in pediatric and adult patients with particular attention to the biologic response modifier treatment options. Important multicenter studies have demonstrated the efficacy of adalimumab, both in adults (VISUAL I, VISUAL II, VISUAL III) and in children (SYCAMORE, ADJUVITE), while for other agents data are still scarce.

Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, achieved significantly (p<0.001) greater Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) clear or almost clear (0/1) responses than adalimumab in a Phase 3 trial in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Meta-analyses of the PASI50, PASI75, PASI90, PASI100, and sPGA0/1 responses after 16 weeks of treatment from eight (three for risankizumab and five for adalimumab) randomized, placebo-controlled trials were conducted to estimate the efficacy difference between risankizumab and adalimumab. For PASI75, PASI90, PASI100 and sPGA0/1 responses, the estimated effect differences (95% CI) between risankizumab and adalimumab were 15.2% (10.1%, 20.4%), 23.7% (15.7%, 31.2%), 20.8% (13.0%, 28.7%) and 20.1% (13.7%, 26.1%), respectively. These results were consistent with the observed efficacy difference from the head-to-head Phase 3 trial, which was not included in the meta-analyses, providing independent, confirmatory evidence of the superior efficacy of risankizumab compared to adalimumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.