The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of biological therapy with cyclosporin A (CsA), azathioprine (AZA), or placebo in uveitis flares and other ocular outcomes in patients with Behçet disease. A comprehensive and sensitive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. We selected articles including: (1) adult patients with Behçet's and uveitis; (2) on biological therapies; (3) placebo or active control with CsA or AZA; (4) analyzing efficacy (number of uveitis flares, macular edema, etc.) and/or safety outcomes. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, and observational studies with > 10 patients were included. The selection, data collection and quality assessment (Oxford scale) was carried out by 2 reviewers independently. Nine articles of moderate quality were included (6 randomized clinical trials and 3 retrospective studies) involving 378 patients. Most of them, apart from the study drugs received systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant drugs. Infliximab was more effective than CsA in reducing short-term uveitis flares and severe complications of retinal vasculitis in the long term. Rituximab was similar to a combination of cytotoxic drugs in improving inflammatory activity. In patients with active uveitis adalimumab was associated with a lower risk of uveitic flare or visual impairment, and in patients with inactive uveitis to a significantly lowered the risk of flare upon corticosteroid withdrawal. Secukinumab and daclizumab were not superior to placebo in reducing uveitis flares, like interferonα compared to other drugs. Our results highlight the need for better designed comparative studies on Behçet's uveitis.

A 59-year-old Native American female presented with a 4-day history of malaise, abdominal pain, nausea, jaundice, and a "sunburn-like rash" on the upper chest and back despite lack of recent sun exposure (Figure 1). Medical history was significant for a twenty-year history of universal vitiligo and a five-year history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate (MTX), adalimumab, prednisone, and naproxen sodium. Cutaneous examination revealed hemorrhagic crusting of upper and lower lips (Figure 2), scleral icterus, diffuse jaundice of the skin, and well-demarcated erythematous patches on mid-upper back and anterior neck. The patient had a few scattered erythematous papules with whitish center on bilateral extensor surfaces of the upper extremities and scattered petechiae on both the trunk and upper extremities.

A 67-year-old retired air force officer presented with a 6-month history of nonproductive cough, progressive exertional dyspnea, and weight loss. He was unable to walk beyond 100 m compared with his baseline of unlimited walking distance. He denied fever, hemoptysis, myalgia, or chest pain. He had a 30-year history of chronic plaque psoriasis with arthritis, which was managed by his dermatologist with emollients and vitamin D analogues. Joint involvement had previously been controlled with methotrexate, which was discontinued 15 years ago after resolution of his symptoms. He developed a polyarthritis flare a year ago, and adalimumab was initiated with good response.

To investigate the effect of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with adalimumab or infliximab on maintaining serum drug and clinical outcomes after the first year of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Second, to assess the influence of methotrexate (MTX) dose on these outcomes. Ninety-two patients with RA starting infliximab (n = 67) or adalimumab (n = 25) tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) with available drug levels and clinical improvement assessment (European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] response) after 12 months were included. Patients were grouped according to concomitant csDMARD use: (i) TNFi monotherapy; (ii) TNFi+MTX; (iii) TNFi with csDMARDs other than MTX (TNFi+OD). Patients receiving MTX were also classified by dose as < 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX<15) and ≥ 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX≥15). Logistic regression analyses were employed. More TNFi+MTX patients had circulating serum TNFi at 12 months (71% TNFi+MTX vs. 20% TNFi+OD vs. 9% TNFi monotherapy). Of these, the probability of maintaining serum TNFi levels was twice (OR 2.3; p = 0.06) than that of patients without MTX. However, statistically significant results were observed only for the highest MTX dose (OR 4.9; p = 0.02). Most patients achieving good EULAR response were treated with TNFi+MTX (81%). The probability of achieving this response was three times higher in patients within the TNFi+MTX group (OR 3.4; p = 0.03); however, no differences were found with regard to MTX dose. The persistence of serum TNFi and the probability of achieving clinical response are influenced by MTX but not by OD in patients with RA treated with infliximab or adalimumab.

Adalimumab, a humanized direct TNF-α antagonist used for the treatment of psoriasis, is known to induce autoimmune phenomena, the most prominent example being anti-nuclear antibody(ANA) production. The clinical implications of ANA induction in psoriasis patients are, however, still unclear. In particular, data regarding its association to treatment response is controversial and no data is available on its detailed dynamics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.