Budesonide-Formoterol Metered-Dose Inhaler vs Fluticasone-Salmeterol Dry-Powder Inhaler.
JAMA Intern Med 2025 Aug 01; 185(8):1005-1013.

Abstract

Importance

Transitioning from metered-dose inhalers to propellant-free dry-powder inhalers could reduce health care-related greenhouse gas emissions, but the clinical difference in outcomes that may be associated with this switch is uncertain.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical difference in outcomes associated with a July 2021 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) formulary change that replaced budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler with fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This within-person, self-controlled case series (SCCS) and matched observational cohort study (cohort study) used data from the US Veterans Affairs health care system from January 2018 through December 2022. Veterans who were prescribed a combination inhaler before and after the formulary change were included in both the SCCS and cohort study. Data were analyzed between April 19, 2024, and April 4, 2025.

Exposures

Treatment with budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler vs fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rescue medication use (albuterol and prednisone fills), emergency department visits, and hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, and pneumonia-specific) were assessed.

Results

Following the VHA formulary change, 260 268 patients switched from budesonide-formoterol metered-dose therapy to fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder therapy. In the SCCS (median [IQR] age, 71 [62-75] years; 91% male), among patients who switched inhalers and experienced the adverse outcomes of interest, treatment with fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler therapy was associated with a 10% decrease in albuterol fills (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.90-0.91]), a 2% increase in prednisone fills (IRR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]), a 5% increase in all-cause emergency department visits (IRR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.04-1.06]), an 8% increase in all-cause hospitalizations (IRR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06-1.09]), a 10% increase in respiratory-related hospitalizations (IRR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07-1.14]), and a 24% increase in pneumonia-specific hospitalizations (IRR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.31]). In the cohort study of 258 557 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [11.3] years; 94% male), those who switched to a fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler had no difference in mortality (1.89% vs 1.90%; adjusted absolute difference, -0.01 percentage points [95% CI, -0.12 to 0.10 percentage points]) but had increases in all-cause hospitalizations (16.14% vs 15.64%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.49 percentage points [95% CI, 0.21-0.78 percentage points]), respiratory-related hospitalizations (3.15% vs 2.74%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.41 percentage points [95% CI, 0.27-0.55 percentage points]), and pneumonia-related hospitalizations (1.15% vs 1.03%; adjusted absolute difference, 0.12 percentage points [95% CI, 0.04-0.21 percentage points]) at 180 days after the switch compared with matched patients who did not switch.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study found that the VHA formulary transition from budesonide-formoterol metered-dose inhaler to fluticasone-salmeterol dry-powder inhaler was associated with increased health care utilization, suggesting potential harm and the need to reevaluate this policy change.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Rabin ASPulmonary Section, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Seelye SMVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Weinstein JBDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hogan CKVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Whittington TNVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cano JVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Miller SASchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Kelley CVeterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Services, Hines, Illinois.
Prescott HCPulmonary Section, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Observational Study
Comparative Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

40622686