State media control influences large language models.
Nature 2026 May 13. [Online ahead of print]

Abstract

Millions of people around the world query large language models (LLMs) for information. Although several studies have compellingly documented the persuasive potential of these models[1-10], there is limited evidence of who or what influences the models themselves, leading to a flurry of concerns about which companies and governments build and regulate the models. Here we show through six studies that government control of the media across the world already influences the output of LLMs via their training data. We use a cross-national audit to show that LLMs exhibit a stronger pro-government valence in the languages of countries with lower media freedom than in those with higher media freedom. This result is correlational, so to triangulate the specific mechanism of how state media control can influence LLMs, we develop a multi-part case study on China's media. We demonstrate that media scripted and curated by the Chinese state appears in LLM training datasets. To evaluate the plausible effect of this inclusion, we use an open-weight model to show that additional pretraining on Chinese state-coordinated media generates more positive answers to prompts about Chinese political institutions and leaders. We link this phenomenon to commercial models through two audit studies demonstrating that prompting models in Chinese generates more positive responses about China's institutions and leaders than do the same queries in English. The combination of influence and persuasive potential across languages suggests the troubling conclusion that states and powerful institutions have increased strategic incentives to leverage media control in the hopes of shaping LLM output.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Waight H0009-0004-8665-0406Department of Sociology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Yang E0000-0002-3696-3226Department of Political Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Yuan Y21st Century China Center, School of Global Policy and Strategy, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Messing SCenter for Social Media and Politics, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Roberts MEDepartment of Political Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Stewart BM0000-0002-7657-3089Department of Sociology and Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. bms4@princeton.edu.
Tucker JA0000-0003-1321-8650Center for Social Media and Politics, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Wilf Family Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

42129566