Is postoperative ARDS different from medical ARDS?
Crit Care 2026 Jun 04. [Online ahead of print]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative patients have been underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whether postoperative ARDS differs from medical ARDS in its clinical trajectory, outcomes, and prognostic determinants remains unclear. We aimed to compare postoperative and medical ARDS with respect to early trajectory, mortality, and risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a tertiary ICU from 2003 to 2023. All consecutive intubated adults fulfilling the ARDS New Global Definition were included. ARDS cases were labeled as postoperative when onset occurred within 15 days after surgery. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, assessed with multivariable Cox analysis. Early ARDS trajectories were assessed at day 3. Multivariable Cox analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with mortality.

RESULTS

Among 1,077 intubated ARDS patients, 455(42%) had postoperative ARDS. Compared with medical ARDS, postoperative ARDS showed more favorable early trajectories (p = 0.03) and lower 90-day mortality (36% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Postoperative ARDS remained independently associated with lower 90-day mortality after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio[aHR] = 0.68, 95%CI:0.56-0.83, p < 0.001). Prognostic determinants differed markedly. In postoperative ARDS, mortality was independently associated with extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (non-respiratory SOFA score: aHR = 1.10, 95%CI:1.05-1.15; bicarbonate: aHR = 0.81 per 5mmol/L, 95%CI:0.69-0.96) and surgical context, (esophageal surgery: aHR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.24-0.70; upper abdominal surgery: aHR = 0.64, 95%CI:0.46-0.91 versus lower abdominal surgery), while no marker of respiratory failure was independently associated with mortality. In medical ARDS, mortality was independently associated with respiratory failure, including PaO2/FiO2 ratio (aHR = 0.88 per 50mmHg, 95%CI:0.81-0.96) and driving pressure (aHR = 1.13 per 5cmH2O, 95%CI = 1.01-1.27), and extrapulmonary organ dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative ARDS differs from medical ARDS in its early clinical trajectory, outcomes, and prognostic determinants. These findings support postoperative ARDS as a distinct clinical subtype, mainly driven by extrapulmonary and surgery-related factors rather than by the lung injury itself, supporting a management approach focused on perioperative prevention and early identification of surgery-related complications.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Pensier JAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Henry JAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Aarab YAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Capdevila MAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Lakbar IAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Monet CAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Vonarb AAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Carson JAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Chanques GAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Molinari NDépartement d'informatique Médicale, Institut Desbrest de Santé Publique (IDESP) INSERM - Université de Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
De Jong AAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Jaber SAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, PhyMedExp, Montpellier, 34295, France. s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr. Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation B (DAR B), 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier, 34295, France. s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

42243987