(British Journal of Radiology[TA])
18,953 results
  • Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: A Review of FDA-regulated Algorithms. [Journal Article]
    Br J Radiol. 2026 May 26. [Online ahead of print]Kharaji M, Safwat AA, … Mossa-Basha MBJ
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into neuroradiology practice, with a growing number of FDA-cleared algorithms now supporting tasks ranging from acute triage to volumetric analysis. This review provides a structured overview of commercially available, FDA-regulated AI tools in neuroradiology, organized by clinical application. These include detection and prioritization of i…
  • Advanced Quantitative CT for Coronary Artery Disease: Integrating Stenosis-, Plaque Quantification, and FFR-CT. [Journal Article]
    Br J Radiol. 2026 May 26. [Online ahead of print]Mihalcioiu S, Mengesha B, … Haenel ABJ
  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a leading cause of death globally. Radiological evaluation of CAD generally consists of stenosis detection by cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). However, this approach can be inefficient and subject to inter-observer variability. In this review we explore the newest developments related to CAD evaluation by CCTA, with an emphasis on plaq…
  • PET/MR: History, Current state, and technology. [Journal Article]
    Br J Radiol. 2026 May 23. [Online ahead of print]An HBJ
  • Integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) combines the molecular sensitivity of PET with the superior soft-tissue contrast and multiparametric capabilities of MRI, enabling simultaneous acquisition and improved spatial-temporal alignment compared with PET/CT. Since its introduction, PET/MR has evolved through major detector and system-level innovations, particula…
  • Imaging Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Risk Stratification in MASLD: Incremental Value of CAC, EAT, CAP, and LSM Beyond Clinical Scores. [Journal Article]
    Br J Radiol. 2026 May 15. [Online ahead of print]Zhong J, He H, … Cai ZBJ
  • CONCLUSIONS: MASLD is consistently associated with greater calcific coronary burden, pericoronary adiposity, hepatic steatosis, and hepatic stiffness relative to non-MASLD comparators. These findings represent between-group imaging differences and should be interpreted as evidence of concurrent adverse imaging burden rather than formal demonstration of incremental predictive value beyond validated clinical risk engines. Whether these biomarkers improve discrimination, reclassification, or net clinical benefit beyond established scores (Pooled Cohort Equations [PCE], SCORE2, Framingham Risk Score [FRS]) requires prospective validation with pre-specified incremental prediction analyses.