(Digestive Diseases and Sciences[TA])
19,718 results
  • Interventional Therapy for Hepatic Hydatidosis with Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein. [Journal Article]
    Dig Dis Sci. 2026 Jul 13. [Online ahead of print]Luogu A, Qian S, … Wu HDD
  • A 56-year-old female suffered from recurrent esophagogastric varices bleeding for 2 years due to cavernous transformation of the portal vein caused by hepatic hydatidosis. Multiple esophageal variceal ligations failed to prevent rebleeding. Transmesenteric vein extrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed to decrease portal pressure gradient and prevent rebleeding.
  • Intestinal Fibrosis in IBD: Rethinking the Inflammatory Paradigm and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities. [Review]
    Dig Dis Sci. 2026 Jul 11. [Online ahead of print]Wang W, Sun Y, Li JDD
  • Intestinal fibrosis is a common and severe complication in the progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Its pathological essence lies in the excessive synthesis and abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components within the intestinal tissue, leading to structural remodeling and dysfunction of the intestinal wall. As the disease progresses, fibrosis is primarily characterized…
  • Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Cholangioscopy-Based Modalities for Indeterminate Biliary Strictures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. [Review]
    Dig Dis Sci. 2026 Jul 11. [Online ahead of print]Talpur AS, Urooj K, … Javaid TDD
  • CONCLUSIONS: SOC (SpyGlass DS) demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity for malignancy in indeterminate biliary strictures, but its interpretation should be guided by clinical context rather than statistical ranking alone. The sensitivity difference between SOC (SpyGlass DS) and combined FISH + brush cytology was not statistically significant in pairwise comparison, supporting FISH + brush cytology as a high-value, lower-morbidity alternative where SOC is unavailable or procedural risk is a concern. SOC was associated with a higher adverse-event rate than cytology-based sampling and showed lower specificity, which carries clinical implications for false-positive diagnoses. Choice of modality should therefore be considered in the context of local diagnostic capacity, patient-level pretest probability, and the relative consequences of false-negative and false-positive results. Comparative cost-effectiveness and the performance of these modalities in community-practice settings warrant further study.