(Journal of Critical Care[TA])
5,314 results
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention: Past, present, perspective. [Journal Article]
    J Crit Care. 2026 Jul 09; 96:155678. [Online ahead of print]Leone M, Marecal L, … Martin-Loeches IJC
  • The prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a key part of managing critically ill patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation. Despite a reduction in exposure to mechanical ventilation, the incidence of VAP remains high, significantly impacting outcomes. In this brief review, at the light of recent meta-analyses, we examine the evolution of VAP prevention over the past few…
  • The rise of medical autonomous care, a paradigmatic turning point for military and civilian delivery of health care. [Review]
    J Crit Care. 2026 Jul 08; 96:155675. [Online ahead of print]Gómez H, Pinsky MR, … Jeyarajah TJC
  • CONCLUSIONS: The MAC-SOS meeting provided a forum for dialogue, sharing of ideas, and discussions on key challenges, obstacles, and opportunities that medical autonomous care technology faces from inception to clinical deployment and post-implementation surveillance. It also served as a primer for the creation of a sustainable alliance between all stakeholders, and a springboard for novel ideas and future collaborations.
  • Greening critical care by harnessing the planetary impact of medications: What fellows need to know. [Review]
    J Crit Care. 2026 Jul 01; 95:155672. [Online ahead of print]Uhland C, Mousa A, … Murthy SJC
  • Care of critically ill patients involves large amounts of medication, perhaps more than any other aspect of the healthcare system. This has substantial environmental impacts. This manuscript describes how the environmental impacts of medications arise along their lifecycle, how to assess those impacts, and opportunities to reduce medication environmental impact across the critical care and caring…
  • Measuring attitudes toward death and dying among adult intensive care unit staff: A systematic review of assessment tools. [Review]
    J Crit Care. 2026 Jun 30; 95:155659. [Online ahead of print]Georgiou A, Williams K, … Brummell ZJC
  • CONCLUSIONS: Current instruments provide fragmented and conceptually divergent assessments of ICU clinicians' attitudes toward death and dying. Limited cross-cultural validation and poor evidence of responsiveness constrain their usefulness for evaluating interventions or supporting improvement. More coherent, implementation-ready measurement tools are needed to strengthen end-of-life culture in intensive care.