(Surgical Endoscopy[TA])
18,901 results
  • Single-center experience with mesh suture for primary parastomal hernia repair. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul 17. [Online ahead of print]Banton J, Blatnik JA, … Majumder ASE
  • CONCLUSIONS: Primary PSH repair with Duramesh alone is associated with high recurrence rates (54.8%) and should not be considered a durable standalone strategy. Though suture pull-through was not identified as a failure mechanism in this limited series, the persistent stomal aperture renders primary repair insufficient regardless of suture construct.
  • Evolving utilization of bariatric surgery since the rise of semaglutide and tirzepatide. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul 17. [Online ahead of print]Kozato A, Patel SS, … Chhabra KRSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: In the Epic Cosmos database, bariatric surgery utilization decreased from 2022 to 2025, and those who underwent bariatric surgery increasingly received GLP-1RA before surgery. Patients who received pre-surgery GLP-1RA were older, White, privately insured, with diabetes and other weight-related comorbidities, while patients who received surgery upfront were Hispanic, Black, and publicly insured. Pre-surgery GLP-1RA use was also driven by center-specific non-clinical factors.
  • Adults undergoing robotic hiatal hernia repair: do surgical and patient factors predict 5-year revision? A systematic review. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul 16. [Online ahead of print]Asiedu J, Shadaloey S, … Brathwaite CSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: Hernia size consistently emerges as the primary determinant of revision following RHHR, with larger hernias demonstrating substantially higher revision rates regardless of surgical approach. Based on available data, the 5-year revision rate for RHHR ranges from 0 to 5.7%, with an estimated weighted average of 3.2%. Technical considerations including mesh reinforcement and reconstruction methods remain incompletely understood due to significant reporting variations across studies. Patient-specific factors require further investigation through adequately powered prospective studies. Future research demands rigorous prospective designs with standardized documentation of surgical techniques, hernia characteristics, and patient profiles to better identify and stratify revision risk factors after RHHR. The development of consensus guidelines for reporting outcomes in hiatal hernia surgery would facilitate meaningful comparison across studies and improve our understanding of optimal surgical approaches.
  • Magnetic compression anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review of early human experience. [Journal Article]
    Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul 16. [Online ahead of print]Kaur A, Shaikh S, … Mani VRSE
  • CONCLUSIONS: Early clinical evidence suggests that MCA is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional suturing or stapling techniques, with encouraging short-term outcomes. It is a promising alternative technique, especially for high-risk cases who cannot undergo general anesthesia or for those with frozen abdomens. MCA with an endoscopic technique can enable immediate resumption of oncological treatment. Due to limited clinical evidence and lack of sufficient data, further clinical trials are warranted to establish safety, efficacy, and cost-benefit before widespread human application.