Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186(3):409-15AJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in myoma diagnosis, mapping, and measurement.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a double-blind study of 106 consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for benign reasons. Myomas (total, 257) were exactly mapped by magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography; in each patient, we counted correctly identified myomas with pathologic position as true value.

RESULTS

The presence of myomas was detected with the same high level of precision by both methods (magnetic resonance imaging: sensitivity, 0.99; specificity, 0.86; transvaginal ultrasonography: sensitivity, 0.99; specificity, 0.91). The mean number of correctly identified myomas was significantly higher by magnetic resonance imaging than by transvaginal ultrasonography (mean difference, 0.51 +/- 1.03; P <.001), a difference that narrowed to 0.08 +/- 0.76 (P =.60) in 26 patients with 1 to 4 myomas and uterine volumes <375 mL. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography myoma diameter measurements had equal and high accuracies in patients with 1 to 4 myomas.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal ultrasonography is as efficient as magnetic resonance imaging in detecting myoma presence, but its capacity for exact myoma mapping falls short of that of magnetic resonance imaging, especially in large (>375 mL) multiple-myoma (>4) uteri.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. hjorth@dadlnet.dkNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11904599

Citation

Dueholm, Margit, et al. "Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis, Mapping, and Measurement of Uterine Myomas." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 186, no. 3, 2002, pp. 409-15.
Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):409-15.
Dueholm, M., Lundorf, E., Hansen, E. S., Ledertoug, S., & Olesen, F. (2002). Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(3), pp. 409-15.
Dueholm M, et al. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis, Mapping, and Measurement of Uterine Myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):409-15. PubMed PMID: 11904599.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. AU - Dueholm,Margit, AU - Lundorf,Erik, AU - Hansen,Estrid S, AU - Ledertoug,Susanne, AU - Olesen,Frede, PY - 2002/3/21/pubmed PY - 2002/4/16/medline PY - 2002/3/21/entrez SP - 409 EP - 15 JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology JO - Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. VL - 186 IS - 3 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in myoma diagnosis, mapping, and measurement. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind study of 106 consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for benign reasons. Myomas (total, 257) were exactly mapped by magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography; in each patient, we counted correctly identified myomas with pathologic position as true value. RESULTS: The presence of myomas was detected with the same high level of precision by both methods (magnetic resonance imaging: sensitivity, 0.99; specificity, 0.86; transvaginal ultrasonography: sensitivity, 0.99; specificity, 0.91). The mean number of correctly identified myomas was significantly higher by magnetic resonance imaging than by transvaginal ultrasonography (mean difference, 0.51 +/- 1.03; P <.001), a difference that narrowed to 0.08 +/- 0.76 (P =.60) in 26 patients with 1 to 4 myomas and uterine volumes <375 mL. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography myoma diameter measurements had equal and high accuracies in patients with 1 to 4 myomas. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasonography is as efficient as magnetic resonance imaging in detecting myoma presence, but its capacity for exact myoma mapping falls short of that of magnetic resonance imaging, especially in large (>375 mL) multiple-myoma (>4) uteri. SN - 0002-9378 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11904599/full_citation L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937802691227 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -