Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals.

Abstract

The mechanism underlying coffee-induced heartburn and dyspepsia remains poorly understood. This has led to speculation that variations in coffee processing may be important. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a coffee brewed with coffee beans processed using conduction roasting will result in fewer symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals compared to a differently processed yet otherwise similar coffee. Thirty coffee-sensitive individuals completed this single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover study in which the symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia were assessed following coffee consumption both in the fasting state and after ingestion of a standard test meal. Consumption of both coffees resulted in heartburn, regurgitation, and dyspepsia in most individuals. No significant differences in the frequency or severity of heartburn, regurgitation, or dyspepsia were demonstrated between the two coffees either in the fasting state or after the test meal. We conclude that differences in the coffee bean roasting process do not result in marked differences in coffee-induced upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Links

  • Aggregator Full Text
  • Authors+Show Affiliations

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-2000, USA.

    Source

    Digestive diseases and sciences 48:4 2003 Apr pg 652-6

    MeSH

    Adult
    Coffee
    Cross-Over Studies
    Double-Blind Method
    Dyspepsia
    Eating
    Female
    Food Handling
    Gastroesophageal Reflux
    Heartburn
    Humans
    Male
    Risk Factors

    Pub Type(s)

    Clinical Trial
    Comparative Study
    Journal Article
    Randomized Controlled Trial
    Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

    Language

    eng

    PubMed ID

    12741451

    Citation

    DiBaise, John K.. "A Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Two Different Coffee-roasting Processes On Development of Heartburn and Dyspepsia in Coffee-sensitive Individuals." Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 48, no. 4, 2003, pp. 652-6.
    DiBaise JK. A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(4):652-6.
    DiBaise, J. K. (2003). A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 48(4), pp. 652-6.
    DiBaise JK. A Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Two Different Coffee-roasting Processes On Development of Heartburn and Dyspepsia in Coffee-sensitive Individuals. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(4):652-6. PubMed PMID: 12741451.
    * Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
    TY - JOUR T1 - A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals. A1 - DiBaise,John K, PY - 2003/5/14/pubmed PY - 2003/6/5/medline PY - 2003/5/14/entrez SP - 652 EP - 6 JF - Digestive diseases and sciences JO - Dig. Dis. Sci. VL - 48 IS - 4 N2 - The mechanism underlying coffee-induced heartburn and dyspepsia remains poorly understood. This has led to speculation that variations in coffee processing may be important. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a coffee brewed with coffee beans processed using conduction roasting will result in fewer symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals compared to a differently processed yet otherwise similar coffee. Thirty coffee-sensitive individuals completed this single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover study in which the symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia were assessed following coffee consumption both in the fasting state and after ingestion of a standard test meal. Consumption of both coffees resulted in heartburn, regurgitation, and dyspepsia in most individuals. No significant differences in the frequency or severity of heartburn, regurgitation, or dyspepsia were demonstrated between the two coffees either in the fasting state or after the test meal. We conclude that differences in the coffee bean roasting process do not result in marked differences in coffee-induced upper gastrointestinal symptoms. SN - 0163-2116 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12741451/full_citation L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=linkout&SEARCH=12741451.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -