Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia: validation of the modified 2010 preliminary American College of Rheumatology criteria and the development of alternative criteria.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Sep; 66(9):1364-73.AC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the 2011 modification of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia (2011ModCr) and develop alternative criteria in a sample of patients with diverse pain disorders that are commonly seen in everyday practice by pain specialists, rheumatologists, and psychologists.

METHODS

Eight clinicians from geographically varied locations in the US evaluated patients with chronic pain and psychiatric disorders using a standard set of questions that included the 2011ModCr questions, the Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR), a 28-area pain location inventory (PLI), and the Short Form 36. Alternative diagnostic criteria were developed from the same data set using logistic regression and receiver operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

Complete data on 321 patients were evaluated; there were 135 patients with fibromyalgia (according to the 1990 ACR criteria) and 186 patients with 16 other common chronic pain problems. Comparing the 2011ModCr with the 1990 ACR criteria provided a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 67%, and a correct classification of 74%. Alternative criteria were derived from the 10-item symptom score from the SIQR symptoms and the 28-area PLI. Maximal diagnostic accuracy was obtained with ≥17 pain sites (range 0-28) and an SIQR symptom score of ≥21 (range 0-50). These alternative criteria had a diagnostic sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 80%, and a correct classification of 80%.

CONCLUSION

The 2011ModCr had robust operating characteristics. Alternative criteria based on symptom items from the SIQR and pain locations from the PLI had comparable operating characteristics, with somewhat better specificity and ease of use.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24497443

Citation

Bennett, Robert M., et al. "Criteria for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia: Validation of the Modified 2010 Preliminary American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the Development of Alternative Criteria." Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 66, no. 9, 2014, pp. 1364-73.
Bennett RM, Friend R, Marcus D, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia: validation of the modified 2010 preliminary American College of Rheumatology criteria and the development of alternative criteria. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(9):1364-73.
Bennett, R. M., Friend, R., Marcus, D., Bernstein, C., Han, B. K., Yachoui, R., Deodhar, A., Kaell, A., Bonafede, P., Chino, A., & Jones, K. D. (2014). Criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia: validation of the modified 2010 preliminary American College of Rheumatology criteria and the development of alternative criteria. Arthritis Care & Research, 66(9), 1364-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22301
Bennett RM, et al. Criteria for the Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia: Validation of the Modified 2010 Preliminary American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the Development of Alternative Criteria. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(9):1364-73. PubMed PMID: 24497443.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia: validation of the modified 2010 preliminary American College of Rheumatology criteria and the development of alternative criteria. AU - Bennett,Robert M, AU - Friend,Ronald, AU - Marcus,Dawn, AU - Bernstein,Cheryl, AU - Han,Bobby Kwanghoon, AU - Yachoui,Ralph, AU - Deodhar,Atul, AU - Kaell,Alan, AU - Bonafede,Peter, AU - Chino,Allan, AU - Jones,Kim D, PY - 2013/11/01/received PY - 2014/01/28/accepted PY - 2014/2/6/entrez PY - 2014/2/6/pubmed PY - 2014/10/18/medline SP - 1364 EP - 73 JF - Arthritis care & research JO - Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) VL - 66 IS - 9 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2011 modification of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia (2011ModCr) and develop alternative criteria in a sample of patients with diverse pain disorders that are commonly seen in everyday practice by pain specialists, rheumatologists, and psychologists. METHODS: Eight clinicians from geographically varied locations in the US evaluated patients with chronic pain and psychiatric disorders using a standard set of questions that included the 2011ModCr questions, the Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR), a 28-area pain location inventory (PLI), and the Short Form 36. Alternative diagnostic criteria were developed from the same data set using logistic regression and receiver operating curve analysis. RESULTS: Complete data on 321 patients were evaluated; there were 135 patients with fibromyalgia (according to the 1990 ACR criteria) and 186 patients with 16 other common chronic pain problems. Comparing the 2011ModCr with the 1990 ACR criteria provided a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 67%, and a correct classification of 74%. Alternative criteria were derived from the 10-item symptom score from the SIQR symptoms and the 28-area PLI. Maximal diagnostic accuracy was obtained with ≥17 pain sites (range 0-28) and an SIQR symptom score of ≥21 (range 0-50). These alternative criteria had a diagnostic sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 80%, and a correct classification of 80%. CONCLUSION: The 2011ModCr had robust operating characteristics. Alternative criteria based on symptom items from the SIQR and pain locations from the PLI had comparable operating characteristics, with somewhat better specificity and ease of use. SN - 2151-4658 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24497443/full_citation DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -