Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Mar; 15(1):67-73.CC

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer screening history was also recorded.

RESULTS

The study population was 54% male (265 of 492) with a mean age of 58.9 years (range, 25-93 years). Initial tissue diagnosis was established at the time of screening colonoscopy in 10.7%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 79.2%, and during emergent surgery in 7.1%. Cancers diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy were more likely to be stage 1 than cancers diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy or emergent surgery (38.5%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm for the screening colonoscopy group, 4.6 cm for the diagnostic colonoscopy group, and 5.0 cm for the emergent surgery group. At least 31% of patients diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy, 19% of patients diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy, and 26% of patients diagnosed at the time of emergent surgery had never undergone a screening colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 90% of colorectal cancer patients were diagnosed after development of symptoms and had more advanced disease than asymptomatic screening patients. Colorectal cancer outcomes will be improved by improving rates of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: courtney.moreno@emoryhealthcare.org.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26602596

Citation

Moreno, Courtney C., et al. "Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation." Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, 2016, pp. 67-73.
Moreno CC, Mittal PK, Sullivan PS, et al. Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(1):67-73.
Moreno, C. C., Mittal, P. K., Sullivan, P. S., Rutherford, R., Staley, C. A., Cardona, K., Hawk, N. N., Dixon, W. T., Kitajima, H. D., Kang, J., Small, W. C., Oshinski, J., & Votaw, J. R. (2016). Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation. Clinical Colorectal Cancer, 15(1), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2015.07.004
Moreno CC, et al. Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15(1):67-73. PubMed PMID: 26602596.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation. AU - Moreno,Courtney C, AU - Mittal,Pardeep K, AU - Sullivan,Patrick S, AU - Rutherford,Robin, AU - Staley,Charles A, AU - Cardona,Kenneth, AU - Hawk,Natalyn N, AU - Dixon,W Thomas, AU - Kitajima,Hiroumi D, AU - Kang,Jian, AU - Small,William C, AU - Oshinski,John, AU - Votaw,John R, Y1 - 2015/07/29/ PY - 2015/04/10/received PY - 2015/07/20/accepted PY - 2015/11/26/entrez PY - 2015/11/26/pubmed PY - 2016/11/2/medline KW - Cancer detection KW - Colorectal cancer KW - Diagnostic colonoscopy KW - Screening colonoscopy KW - Screening compliance SP - 67 EP - 73 JF - Clinical colorectal cancer JO - Clin Colorectal Cancer VL - 15 IS - 1 N2 - INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer screening history was also recorded. RESULTS: The study population was 54% male (265 of 492) with a mean age of 58.9 years (range, 25-93 years). Initial tissue diagnosis was established at the time of screening colonoscopy in 10.7%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 79.2%, and during emergent surgery in 7.1%. Cancers diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy were more likely to be stage 1 than cancers diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy or emergent surgery (38.5%, 7.2%, and 0%, respectively). Median tumor size was 3.0 cm for the screening colonoscopy group, 4.6 cm for the diagnostic colonoscopy group, and 5.0 cm for the emergent surgery group. At least 31% of patients diagnosed at the time of screening colonoscopy, 19% of patients diagnosed at the time of diagnostic colonoscopy, and 26% of patients diagnosed at the time of emergent surgery had never undergone a screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 90% of colorectal cancer patients were diagnosed after development of symptoms and had more advanced disease than asymptomatic screening patients. Colorectal cancer outcomes will be improved by improving rates of colorectal cancer screening. SN - 1938-0674 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26602596/full_citation DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -