Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May; 50(4):1311-1324.AS

Abstract

Emotional reactions to a partner's extradyadic romantic interests are assumed to be negative and characterized by jealousy, an emotional state that arises over a perceived threat to one's relationship. Yet, reactions may also be positive, and involve compersion, or taking joy in one's partner's pleasure in other sexual and relational encounters. Although some have argued that compersion is the opposite of jealousy, research suggests that compersion and jealousy may not be opposing constructs, despite being treated this way in both theoretical and empirical research. Using a convenience sample of polyamorous (N = 3530) and monogamous (N = 1358) individuals, we draw on theories of jealousy, emotional ambivalence, and emotional forecasting to examine people's anticipated affective responses to hypothetical situations involving a partner's extradyadic relations and assess whether experience with having a partner engage in extradyadic relations was associated with anticipating less jealousy and more compersion. Results suggest that people in polyamorous relationships report less jealousy and more compersion with their partners, and that personal experience involving a partner's extradyadic romantic interests predicted more compersion and less jealousy, with experience predicting greater increases in compersion among monogamous than polyamorous participants. Finally, while anticipated compersion was associated with greater relationship satisfaction, neither jealousy nor ambivalence was associated with relationship satisfaction. These results further demonstrate that individuals can experience both positive and negative reactions to a partner's extradyadic relations, both based on actual experience and projection of responses to future events, and that real-life experiences are important in anticipating these emotions.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA. Rbalzarini@txstate.edu.Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.Department of Psychology, Champlain College, Burlington, VT, USA.Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

34041641

Citation

Balzarini, Rhonda N., et al. "Compersion: when Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy." Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 50, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1311-1324.
Balzarini RN, McDonald JN, Kohut T, et al. Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(4):1311-1324.
Balzarini, R. N., McDonald, J. N., Kohut, T., Lehmiller, J. J., Holmes, B. M., & Harman, J. J. (2021). Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(4), 1311-1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1
Balzarini RN, et al. Compersion: when Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(4):1311-1324. PubMed PMID: 34041641.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy. AU - Balzarini,Rhonda N, AU - McDonald,James N, AU - Kohut,Taylor, AU - Lehmiller,Justin J, AU - Holmes,Bjarne M, AU - Harman,Jennifer J, Y1 - 2021/05/26/ PY - 2019/12/20/received PY - 2020/09/26/accepted PY - 2020/07/03/revised PY - 2021/5/28/pubmed PY - 2021/10/16/medline PY - 2021/5/27/entrez KW - Affective forecasting KW - Compersion KW - Consensual non-monogamy KW - Jealousy KW - Monogamy KW - Polyamory SP - 1311 EP - 1324 JF - Archives of sexual behavior JO - Arch Sex Behav VL - 50 IS - 4 N2 - Emotional reactions to a partner's extradyadic romantic interests are assumed to be negative and characterized by jealousy, an emotional state that arises over a perceived threat to one's relationship. Yet, reactions may also be positive, and involve compersion, or taking joy in one's partner's pleasure in other sexual and relational encounters. Although some have argued that compersion is the opposite of jealousy, research suggests that compersion and jealousy may not be opposing constructs, despite being treated this way in both theoretical and empirical research. Using a convenience sample of polyamorous (N = 3530) and monogamous (N = 1358) individuals, we draw on theories of jealousy, emotional ambivalence, and emotional forecasting to examine people's anticipated affective responses to hypothetical situations involving a partner's extradyadic relations and assess whether experience with having a partner engage in extradyadic relations was associated with anticipating less jealousy and more compersion. Results suggest that people in polyamorous relationships report less jealousy and more compersion with their partners, and that personal experience involving a partner's extradyadic romantic interests predicted more compersion and less jealousy, with experience predicting greater increases in compersion among monogamous than polyamorous participants. Finally, while anticipated compersion was associated with greater relationship satisfaction, neither jealousy nor ambivalence was associated with relationship satisfaction. These results further demonstrate that individuals can experience both positive and negative reactions to a partner's extradyadic relations, both based on actual experience and projection of responses to future events, and that real-life experiences are important in anticipating these emotions. SN - 1573-2800 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/34041641/Compersion:_When_Jealousy_Inducing_Situations_D DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -