Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparative analysis of formyl peptide receptor 1 and formyl peptide receptor 2 reveals shared and preserved signalling profiles.
Br J Pharmacol. 2025 Oct; 182(20):4911-4925.BJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The pattern recognition receptors, formyl peptide receptors, FPR1 and FPR2, are G protein-coupled receptors that recognize many different pathogen- and host-derived ligands. While FPR1 conveys pro-inflammatory signals, FPR2 is linked with pro-resolving outcomes. To analyse how the two very similar FPRs exert opposite effects in modulating inflammatory responses despite their high homology, a shared expression profile on immune cells and an overlapping ligand repertoire, we questioned whether the signalling profile differs between these two receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We deduced EC50 and Emax values for synthetic, pathogen-derived and host-derived peptide agonists for both FPR1 and FPR2 and analysed them within the framework of biased signalling. We furthermore investigated whether FPR isoform-specific agonists affect the ex vivo lifespan of human neutrophils.

KEY RESULTS

The FPRs share a core signature across signalling pathways. Whereas the synthetic WKYMVm and formylated peptides acted as potent agonists at FPR1, and at FPR2, only WKYMVm was a full agonist. Natural FPR2 agonists, irrespective of N-terminal formylation, displayed lower activity ratios, suggesting an underutilized signalling potential of this receptor. FPR2 agonism did not counteract LPS-induced neutrophil survival, indicating that FPR2 activation per se is not linked with a pro-resolving function.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Activation of FPR1 and FPR2 by a representative agonist panel revealed a lack of a receptor-specific signalling texture, challenging assumptions about distinct inflammatory profiles linked to specific receptor isoforms, signalling patterns or agonist classes. These conclusions are restricted to the specific agonists and signalling pathways examined.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue Drugs and Drug Targets in Metabolic and Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v182.20/issuetoc.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Research Group Cellular Biochemistry - Regulatory Mechanisms of Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Virology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation and "Cells in Motion" Interfaculty Centre, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.Research Group Cellular Biochemistry - Regulatory Mechanisms of Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Virology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation and "Cells in Motion" Interfaculty Centre, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. Institute of Experimental Pathology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.Institute of Experimental Pathology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.Institute of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.Research Group Cellular Biochemistry - Regulatory Mechanisms of Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Virology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation and "Cells in Motion" Interfaculty Centre, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.Research Group Cellular Biochemistry - Regulatory Mechanisms of Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Virology, Center of Molecular Biology of Inflammation and "Cells in Motion" Interfaculty Centre, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Comparative Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

39294930

Citation

Pajonczyk, Denise, et al. "Comparative Analysis of Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 and Formyl Peptide Receptor 2 Reveals Shared and Preserved Signalling Profiles." British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 182, no. 20, 2025, pp. 4911-4925.
Pajonczyk D, Sternschulte MF, Soehnlein O, et al. Comparative analysis of formyl peptide receptor 1 and formyl peptide receptor 2 reveals shared and preserved signalling profiles. Br J Pharmacol. 2025;182(20):4911-4925.
Pajonczyk, D., Sternschulte, M. F., Soehnlein, O., Bermudez, M., Raabe, C. A., & Rescher, U. (2025). Comparative analysis of formyl peptide receptor 1 and formyl peptide receptor 2 reveals shared and preserved signalling profiles. British Journal of Pharmacology, 182(20), 4911-4925. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.17334
Pajonczyk D, et al. Comparative Analysis of Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 and Formyl Peptide Receptor 2 Reveals Shared and Preserved Signalling Profiles. Br J Pharmacol. 2025;182(20):4911-4925. PubMed PMID: 39294930.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative analysis of formyl peptide receptor 1 and formyl peptide receptor 2 reveals shared and preserved signalling profiles. AU - Pajonczyk,Denise, AU - Sternschulte,Merle F, AU - Soehnlein,Oliver, AU - Bermudez,Marcel, AU - Raabe,Carsten A, AU - Rescher,Ursula, Y1 - 2024/09/18/ PY - 2024/07/03/revised PY - 2024/02/19/received PY - 2024/08/06/accepted PY - 2025/9/16/medline PY - 2024/9/19/pubmed PY - 2024/9/19/entrez KW - ERK1/2 activation KW - GPCR KW - biased agonism KW - cAMP generation KW - formyl peptide receptor KW - neutrophil lifespan KW - receptor internalization SP - 4911 EP - 4925 JF - British journal of pharmacology JO - Br J Pharmacol VL - 182 IS - 20 N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pattern recognition receptors, formyl peptide receptors, FPR1 and FPR2, are G protein-coupled receptors that recognize many different pathogen- and host-derived ligands. While FPR1 conveys pro-inflammatory signals, FPR2 is linked with pro-resolving outcomes. To analyse how the two very similar FPRs exert opposite effects in modulating inflammatory responses despite their high homology, a shared expression profile on immune cells and an overlapping ligand repertoire, we questioned whether the signalling profile differs between these two receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We deduced EC50 and Emax values for synthetic, pathogen-derived and host-derived peptide agonists for both FPR1 and FPR2 and analysed them within the framework of biased signalling. We furthermore investigated whether FPR isoform-specific agonists affect the ex vivo lifespan of human neutrophils. KEY RESULTS: The FPRs share a core signature across signalling pathways. Whereas the synthetic WKYMVm and formylated peptides acted as potent agonists at FPR1, and at FPR2, only WKYMVm was a full agonist. Natural FPR2 agonists, irrespective of N-terminal formylation, displayed lower activity ratios, suggesting an underutilized signalling potential of this receptor. FPR2 agonism did not counteract LPS-induced neutrophil survival, indicating that FPR2 activation per se is not linked with a pro-resolving function. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Activation of FPR1 and FPR2 by a representative agonist panel revealed a lack of a receptor-specific signalling texture, challenging assumptions about distinct inflammatory profiles linked to specific receptor isoforms, signalling patterns or agonist classes. These conclusions are restricted to the specific agonists and signalling pathways examined. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Drugs and Drug Targets in Metabolic and Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v182.20/issuetoc. SN - 1476-5381 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/39294930 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -