TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Functional Outcome Between Intra-Articular Injection of Corticosteroid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AU - Shahzad,Hafiz Faisal, AU - Taqi,Muhammad, AU - Gillani,Syed Faraz Ul Hassan Shah, AU - Masood,Faisal, AU - Ali,Munawar, Y1 - 2021/12/21/ PY - 2021/12/20/accepted PY - 2022/2/1/entrez PY - 2022/2/2/pubmed PY - 2022/2/2/medline KW - frozen shoulder KW - intra-articular platelet-rich plasma KW - intra-articular steroids KW - prp KW - vas score SP - e20560 EP - e20560 JF - Cureus JO - Cureus VL - 13 IS - 12 N2 - Background In this study, we compared the functional outcome of intra-articular injection of corticosteroid versus platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). Methodology This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, from January 2018 to December 2018.A total of 202 patients with FS aged 40 to 70 years were included. Patients with medical comorbidities such as chronic liver disease (assessed on history and serum bilirubin >2.0 mg/dl), chronic renal failure (assessed on history and serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL), and chronic steroid use were excluded. Employing an anterior approach, subjects in groups A and B received one intra-articular injection of 2 mL PRP and 2 mL (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate, respectively. Age, gender, duration of disease, and pre-injection and post-injection range of motion (ROM) (flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) were assessed. The University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were measured and compared before and after the injection. All patients were followed at regular intervals post-therapy and the final functional outcome was measured after 12 weeks of therapy. Results Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant when comparing flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation in both groups using the independent t-test. The ROM in group A (intra-articular PRP) improved significantly (p < 0.05) after injection compared to group B (intra-articular corticosteroid). The ROM after PRP for abduction was 147.09 ± 7.78, forward flexion 154.52 ± 6.48, external rotation 71.59 ± 7.43, and internal rotation 59.20 ± 3.96. The ROM in the steroid injection group for abduction was 129.07 ± 4.72, forward flexion 127.14 ± 7.87, external rotation 56.27 ± 5.93, and internal rotation 48.86 ± 4.90. Conclusions Intra-articular injection of PRP resulted in a substantial improvement in the VAS score, UCLA, and ROM when compared to intra-articular corticosteroid injection in patients with FS. SN - 2168-8184 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/35103139/ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -